Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

S. 397 Call to Arms

Tuesday, April 5, 2005

This is it, folks--show time.

The U.S. Senate is preparing to debate S. 397, the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. And the debate could be already underway by the time you read this column.

Our national political victories during the past eight years have brought us to this moment. This is the culmination of four full federal election cycles, including two U.S. presidential contests. Without the numerous victories we have achieved at the ballot box, we would not be on the verge of this debate today.

It`s worth recalling how we came to this point. In 1998, greedy trial lawyers teamed up with gun-hating politicians from big cities. Coached on with free legal assistance from gun-ban groups, they unleashed a wave of lawsuits designed to harass the gun industry into adopting the same tired gun control ideas they couldn`t push through Congress. All of the lawsuits had a common theme--that the firearm industry was somehow responsible for the unforeseeable acts of criminals who misused their products.

The Clinton administration encouraged the effort, adding the threat of bureaucratic extortion by federal agencies against companies that refused to bow down to their demands. The enemies of freedom filed their suits throughout the country, in more than 30 separate court actions, and thought their job was done. All they had to do was sit back and wait for "settlement" offers from beleaguered companies that would have no choice but to embrace their poisonous agenda of new firearm restrictions. And, they chortled that NRA was powerless in the legal system. They thought they had taken our grassroots strength out of the equation.

But they were wrong. The answer to the lawsuits was simple, and it rested precisely where our strength is the greatest--with elected lawmakers accountable to the voting public. Georgia was the first state to prohibit these baseless lawsuits. Now, 32 other states have followed Georgia`s lead. The issue they addressed was simple: public policy should be determined by elected, accountable lawmakers--not anti-gun activist trial lawyers and judges with personal agendas.

But our rights will not be secure until every last jurisdiction in the country is covered by this common-sense legal reform. And our best chance to put national preemption of these baseless lawsuits on the books is now upon us.

The fact that 33 states have already taken this step is not reason enough to force the U.S. Senate to act. Neither is the fact that the bill has remarkable support from the business and labor communities alike--from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to local machinist unions. No, there is only one factor that will push our senators to approve this critical measure. That factor is you.

The stakes of this debate couldn`t be higher. Unchecked, these lawsuits threaten not only the firearm industry but also our fundamental rights. The firearm industry has spent more than $200 million defending against these predatory lawsuits, an enormous figure for an industry that does not have deep pockets. A single financial judgment, rendered by an anti-gun judge or jury, could hurl the entire industry into financial ruin.

The stakes of this debate couldn`t be higher.

Unchecked, these lawsuits threaten not only the firearm industry but also our fundamental rights. A single financial judgment, rendered by an anti-gun judge or jury, could hurl the entire industry into financial ruin.

Worse yet, a single judge or jury could also impose a fiendishly complex system of arbitrary new restrictions upon commerce in arms and ammunition--just because a slick trial lawyer made it sound like a good idea. In either case, our fundamental Right to Keep and Bear Arms will be reduced to a paper artifact with less strength than the thin parchment upon which it was first written.

The industry is not the ultimate target of the lawsuits. The crosshairs of this courtroom harassment campaign are firmly focused on our rights. One of the architects of the global gun ban movement recently admitted as much. Natalie Goldring, executive director of the Program on General Disarmament at the University of Maryland, spoke with unusual candor about the ultimate goal of global gun registration, telling the All Africa News Service: "In order to hold governments, companies and even individuals responsible when small arms and light weapons are used illegally, it is critical to have weapons biographies."

By "weapons biographies" she doesn`t mean a hunter`s journal of game taken, or a benchrest shooter`s write-ups of loading data performance. She means an exhaustive centralized registration process, tracking every location and owner of a firearm from its inception in a blast furnace to its ultimate confiscation and destruction. And she clearly means to say that everyone involved in the process, from "governments, companies and even individuals" should be held "responsible" if that firearm is used illegally.

Powerless to ban all guns now, they will settle for dividing the world into two classes--those who own firearms and are thus considered globally responsible for their misuse, and everyone else. And if you protest being considered a root cause of global conflict simply for exercising your constitutional rights, international anti-gun activist Rebecca Peters has an answer for you, as expressed during her recent debate with Wayne LaPierre: "Get another hobby."

It`s time for someone to get another hobby, all right. That`s the message we need to deliver to the gun-ban groups, their vulture lawyers and their cheering peanut gallery of international social engineers. And the clearest way we can send that message is to successfully urge the Senate to pass S. 397 without delay or anti-gun amendments.

This objective brings necessary risk. The enemies of Freedom will stop at nothing to destroy this legislation, and their playbook is still open from last March when the Senate first debated this bill.

They know that they cannot win this debate on the merits, so they will dodge and duck and delay until they can do so no longer. Then they will attempt to poison the bill with irrelevant amendments. We can expect them to push forward with an effort to ban .50-caliber rifles, and we can also expect them to try to ban handguns in new calibers they falsely portray as "armor piercing." They may also try again to ban gun shows, as we know them, or to renew and expand the Clinton gun ban on semi-automatics.

Senator Chuck Schumer made their goal clear when he told reporters: "We will add amendments to this bill that may make the sponsors less enthusiastic about passing it." Subject matter doesn`t matter a whit to them. They intend to destroy this common-sense bill by tying it to restrictions on our Second Amendment freedoms.

Now it falls to you to carry our standard into this battle. Contact your senators today, and urge them to co-sponsor and support S. 397. Let them know you consider any anti-gun amendments to be an unacceptable effort to kill the bill, and urge them to vote against those amendments. You can reach the Senate switchboard by calling (202) 224-3121. Tell them your state, and they will connect you. Or visit our website, www.nraila.org, for detailed contact information.

Whether by letter, fax, phone or e-mail, it`s critical for you to contact your senators today. We must urge the Senate to act now, and decide whether national policy will be set by elected lawmakers or activist judges. We must restore the fundamental legal principle that people are accountable for their own actions. And we must save our rights from the relentless effort to hold all gun owners responsible for global conflict and the criminal acts of third parties.

Contact your senators today!

IN THIS ARTICLE
Reckless Lawsuits
TRENDING NOW
Your Members of Congress Need to Hear from You on the Hearing Protection Act of 2017

News  

Friday, January 13, 2017

Your Members of Congress Need to Hear from You on the Hearing Protection Act of 2017

On Monday, Sen. Mike Crapo (R-ID) – joined by co-sponsors Sens. Jerry Moran (R-KS) and Rand Paul (R-KY) – introduced S. 59, the Hearing Protection Act of 2017 (HPA). Similar legislation was introduced in the ...

Alert: WA State Proposes Draconian Gun Ban Bills

News  

Friday, January 13, 2017

Alert: WA State Proposes Draconian Gun Ban Bills

Inspired, perhaps, by Oscar Wilde (“Moderation is a fatal thing. Nothing succeeds like excess”), Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson has announced two new sweeping gun control bills, with Sen. David Frockt (D-Seattle) and Rep. ...

New Hampshire: Constitutional/Permitless Carry Bill Passes Senate!

Thursday, January 19, 2017

New Hampshire: Constitutional/Permitless Carry Bill Passes Senate!

Today, Senate Bill 12, legislation eliminating the requirement to obtain a permit in order to lawfully carry, passed the Senate without amendment, by a 13-10 vote.  SB 12 will now go to the House of ...

National Concealed Carry Reciprocity Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them

News  

Friday, January 13, 2017

National Concealed Carry Reciprocity Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them

On January 3rd, Congressman Richard Hudson (R-N.C.8th) introduced H.R. 38, the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2017, which simply allows lawful firearm carriers from any state to carry a concealed firearm in any other state. The bill ...

Virginia: Senate Committee to Hear Numerous Gun Bills Tomorrow

Tuesday, January 17, 2017

Virginia: Senate Committee to Hear Numerous Gun Bills Tomorrow

Tomorrow, January 18, the Senate Courts of Justice is expected to hear and possibly vote on several firearm-related bills.

Kansas: Bill Introduced Attempting to Repeal Pro-Self-Defense Law

Tuesday, January 17, 2017

Kansas: Bill Introduced Attempting to Repeal Pro-Self-Defense Law

In 2013, the Kansas Legislature passed the Public Building Security Act, pro-gun legislation that amended the Personal and Family Protection Act. 

Supreme Court Asked to Review California’s Restrictive Carry Regime

News  

Friday, January 13, 2017

Supreme Court Asked to Review California’s Restrictive Carry Regime

On Thursday, the NRA-supported case Peruta v. California took an important step towards restoring the right to bear arms in California.  The plaintiffs in the case, California gun owners and the California Rifle and Pistol ...

NRA Statement on Nomination of Ryan Zinke to Secretary of the Interior

News  

Friday, December 16, 2016

NRA Statement on Nomination of Ryan Zinke to Secretary of the Interior

Chris W. Cox, executive director of the National Rifle Association's Institute for Legislative Action, issued the following statement on the nomination of Congressman Ryan Zinke to be the Secretary of the Interior

Indiana: Legislative Session Begins with Numerous Pro-Gun Bills Filed

Friday, January 13, 2017

Indiana: Legislative Session Begins with Numerous Pro-Gun Bills Filed

With the 2017 Indiana legislative session underway, we are happy to report that a number of pro-gun bills have been filed.

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

Gun Laws  

Thursday, January 1, 2015

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

CAUTION: Federal and state firearms laws are subject to frequent change. This summary is not to be considered as legal advice or a restatement of law.

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -
NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.