HB-449 is scheduled for a hearing in the Florida House Crime Prevention, Corrections & Safety Committee Thursday, March 15, 2001 at 8:30 AM !!! That`s TOMORROW MORNING!
HB-449 by Rep. Allan Bense, Rep. Jerry Paul & others is the HOUSE bill to stop governments from filing frivolous and reckless lawsuits against gun manufacturers. [Full summary below]
Emails are immediately needed to members of this committee.
IN THE SUBJECT LINE PUT: SUPPORT HB-449 by Reps. Bense & Paul - Stop Gun Manufacturer Lawsuits
FLORIDA HOUSE CRIME PREVENTION, CORRECTION & SAFETY COMMITTEE MEMBERS TO CONTACT:
Rep. Gus Bilirakis, Chair (R) email@example.com
Rep. Aaron Bean, V-C (R) firstname.lastname@example.org
Rep. Bev Kilmer (R) email@example.com
Rep. Dick Kravitz (R) firstname.lastname@example.org
Rep. Mitch Needelman (R) email@example.com
Rep. Joseph Spratt (R) firstname.lastname@example.org
Rep. Dwight Stansel (D) email@example.com
BILL SUMMARY: HB-449 CIVIL ACTIONS/GUN MANUFACTURERS
Prohibits any lawsuit by, or on behalf of, the state, county, municipality, town, special purpose district or other political subdivision for damages, abatement, or injunctive relief resulting from the lawful design, marketing, distribution, or sale of firearms or ammunition to the public. Provides that the potential of a firearm or ammunition to cause injury, damage, or death is not a defective condition, whether the firearm or ammunition is discharged legally or illegally. Provides for the award of expenses and attorney`s fees.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR THOSE WHO WANT IT:
REASONS THESE LAWSUITS MUST BE STOPPED
In November 1998, Miami-Dade Mayor Alex Penelas announced that he was filing a lawsuit against over 20 major firearms manufacturers.
In December 1999, Circuit Judge Amy Dean threw Penelas`s Miami-Dade lawsuit out of court. In dismissing the lawsuit Judge Dean said the county ``lacks standing`` to sue firearms manufacturers. Dean also ruled that the county can`t collect damages from the nation`s major gun manufacturers. She also said individual victims have rights to sue the industry for negligence or product liability, but not the county.
Miami-Dade Mayor Alex Penelas immediately vowed to continue the attack on gun manufacturers and appeal the ruling in the state Third District Court of Appeal. Penelas also said he and Miami-Dade county were considering a class action lawsuit against gun manufacturers and that he planned to have the county join the Clinton Administration if Clinton and HUD decided to bring a lawsuit against the gun industry.
On February 14, 2001, the Florida Third District Court of Appeal also threw out Mayor Penelas`s lawsuit calling it an improper "attempt to regulate firearms" through the courts.
Mayor Penelas HAS ONCE AGAIN FILED AN APPEAL (this time trying to go to the Florida Supreme Court) to force the firearms industry to expend more money fighting the lawsuit while he uses public funds -- tax dollars -- to engage in malicious lawsuits which promote his own personal gun control agenda to try to impose backdoor gun control.
These lawsuits are nothing more than extortion, coercion, and blackmail. They are patterned after the tobacco lawsuits. They are designed to extort settlements from gun manufacturers to avoid protracted litigation and enormous legal fees which threaten to bankrupt them long before they could ever get final resolution in court.
They are unbridled attempts at intimidation; attempts to force actions that are detrimental, not only to the defendants, but to the business community, to the Second Amendment and to Freedom.
Even anti-gun newspaper editorials have railed against these lawsuits as abusive. The ST. PETERSBURG TIMES called the lawsuits "litigation tyranny" and an "abuse of the court system" and said, "This epidemic of running to the courthouse to address every public ill needs to stop."
On April 2, 2000 The Washington Post, the most anti-gun newspaper in the county, said:
"The government has nearly unlimited resources...Even a weak case can be used to bully those who lack the resources to fight to the end...So where is the line between legitimate governance and extortion? "Against the gun makers, the government does not even claim to have its own cause of action. Rather it is organizing a suit by local authorities and then stepping into negotiations to push its [political] policies as a basis for settlement... "To [allow these lawsuits] undermines the legislative branch, demeans the judicial and poses threats to the liberty of those who obey the law but fall out of official favor."
The transparent goal of taking a large number of weak cases to court simultaneously is not to win verdicts, but to bankrupt small firearms companies by inflicting massive legal costs upon them. That is nothing less than a naked attempt to ban future sales of guns by putting manufacturers out of business.
The Legislature needs to pass this legislation. Otherwise the message will be that it is open season on every manufacturer, wholesaler and retailer of any legitimate product ever made or to be made, if there is any potential that the product could in some manner cause injury when misused, abused or neglected by the consumer or a criminal.
On October 5, the New York Times published an article titled, “Harvey Weinstein Paid Off Sexual Harassment Accusers for Decades.” The piece detailed allegations that the mogul used his position of influence to make unwanted ...
What happens to the 400 million or so firearms already in private hands? How does society actually benefit from his plan? Stephens doesn’t say. He apparently just trusts that things would eventually work themselves out ...
Since the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its landmark rulings in District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. Chicago, lower courts across the country have expressed their disagreement with – or downright hostility to ...
It’s important to celebrate that law-abiding Americans are now closer than they have been in nearly half a century to being able to exercise their firearms freedom in our nation’s capital. That is real progress.
Project Veritas’s “American Pravda” series has focused on the media itself, with prior releases including segments on CNN producers and personalities casting doubt on the network’s own narrative about Russian influence in the U.S. presidential ...
Today, without considering the unintended effects of such poorly thought out legislation, the Massachusetts state House of Representatives passed Amendment 1 attached to House Bill 3951 with overreaching language that would ban modifications commonly made ...
On Tuesday, October 17, the San Jose City Council will be discussing a proposed firearms ordinance that will require any person who possesses a firearm in their residence to store the firearm in a locked ...
Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.