Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

California DOJ Awarded Participation Trophy for Losing Bruen Brief

Monday, November 21, 2022

California DOJ Awarded Participation Trophy for Losing Bruen Brief

Those of earlier generations used to chuckle when small children were presented trophies merely for participating in organized sports. When this practice began, few could have predicted that this effete custom would someday extend to attorneys filing briefs before the U.S. Supreme Court.

On November 10, the National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG) announced the winners of its 2022 Supreme Court Best Brief Awards. According to the group, the awards “are given annually to honor appellate practitioners from state attorney general offices who have exhibited superb work in representing their states before the U.S. Supreme Court.”

The winners included several California government attorneys for their amicus brief in NYSRPA v. Bruen.

In deciding Bruen, the Court reiterated its previous holdings from the District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. Chicago that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms. Moreover, the Court made clear that the right to bear arms extends outside the home.

Specifically, the Court struck down New York’s discretionary carry licensing regime. The illegal New York scheme required applicants to show “proper cause” that they needed the license and granted government officials wide authority to determine if the applicant met this burden.

As one would expect of the anti-Second Amendment one-party state, California argued in its amicus brief that New York’s unconstitutional law be upheld. In direct contrast to the Court’s decision, the brief took the position that the plaintiffs “have not stated a claim under the Second Amendment.”

So, according to the NAAG, the supposed best U.S. Supreme Court brief of the year need not be one that the Court finds at all compelling. Just wasting taxpayer resources on a losing effort that aligns with NAAG’s politics is deserving of recognition.

Even more cringeworthy than the “award” itself is how California Attorney General Rob Bonta reacted to the dubious honor. Bonta boasted in a November 10 press release, “I am incredibly proud of my team for their work on this brief and all the tireless hours spent defending gun regulations that safeguard our communities.” The missive made no mention that team gun control in fact lost the case.

As Bonta represents the world capital of self-congratulation, Hollywood, perhaps his revelry in a participation trophy is to be expected. Here at NRA, Justice Clarence Thomas’s brilliant Bruen opinion and that millions more Americans can now exercise their Right-to-Carry outside the home is more than enough award.

IN THIS ARTICLE
California NYSRPA v. Bruen
TRENDING NOW
Redditors Embarrass Virginia Assembly’s Chief Gun Banner

News  

Tuesday, September 8, 2026

Redditors Embarrass Virginia Assembly’s Chief Gun Banner

In late August, Virginia State Delegate Dan Helmer (D-10), who represents a portion of the Northern Virginia D.C. suburb of Fairfax County, took to Reddit for an “ask me anything” (AMA) question and answer session.

Virginia Case Shows Gun Control is Aimed at Decent Citizens, Not Criminals

News  

Tuesday, September 8, 2026

Virginia Case Shows Gun Control is Aimed at Decent Citizens, Not Criminals

Economics has a concept called “revealed preference.” The gist is that a person’s observed actions reveal more about their preferences than what a person might profess to favor. 

Promise to Practice: Federal Firearm Rights Restoration is Now a Reality

News  

Tuesday, September 8, 2026

Promise to Practice: Federal Firearm Rights Restoration is Now a Reality

The federal government’s promise to provide a pathway to restore firearm rights is no longer merely a commitment on paper. 

NRA Files Amicus Brief in Supreme Court “Assault Weapons” Cases

Saturday, September 5, 2026

NRA Files Amicus Brief in Supreme Court “Assault Weapons” Cases

The National Rifle Association, alongside the Independence Institute and the American Suppressor Association, filed an amicus brief on Friday in the consolidated cases Viramontes v. Cook County and Grant v. Higgins, which challenge the "assault weapons” bans ...

Unhealthy Exposure: Gun Ban Advocates Allergic to Defensive Gun Use

News  

Tuesday, September 8, 2026

Unhealthy Exposure: Gun Ban Advocates Allergic to Defensive Gun Use

One of the narratives invented by gun control activists and their political allies to try to make their agenda more palatable to the general public has been to recast gun crime as a “public health ...

Biden-Era “Engaged in the Business” Rule (Again) Ruled Illegal

News  

Monday, August 31, 2026

Biden-Era “Engaged in the Business” Rule (Again) Ruled Illegal

The anti-gun programs and policies of the Biden-Harris administration have been falling like dominoes, lately.

Federal Court Strikes Down NFA Registration Requirements for Suppressors, Short-Barreled Rifles, and Short-Barreled Shotguns in NRA Case

Wednesday, August 5, 2026

Federal Court Strikes Down NFA Registration Requirements for Suppressors, Short-Barreled Rifles, and Short-Barreled Shotguns in NRA Case

In another major victory for the National Rifle Association and law-abiding gun owners, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas today held that the National Firearms Act’s registration and approval requirements for ...

Commerce Dept. Explains Why Unconstitutional Microstamping is Also Ineffective

News  

Monday, August 31, 2026

Commerce Dept. Explains Why Unconstitutional Microstamping is Also Ineffective

On August 12, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) sent a letter to U.S. House Committee on Science, Space and Technology Chairman Brian Babin (R-Texas) reiterating what gun rights ...

Questions and Answers About the Texas NFA Case

News  

Monday, August 17, 2026

Questions and Answers About the Texas NFA Case

On August 12, we reported on an important development in the ongoing litigation over the National Firearms Act (NFA) filed by multiple plaintiffs in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. These included, ...

Australia Remains Committed to Eliminating Guns from the Law-Abiding

News  

Monday, August 31, 2026

Australia Remains Committed to Eliminating Guns from the Law-Abiding

It’s been a long time since Australia had relatively sensible gun laws.  While national regulations did not really come into play until the 1990s, the states and territories began imposing severe restrictions on lawful gun owners ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.