Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

The Cost of Confiscation: Millions of Dollars, No Sense

Monday, February 8, 2021

The Cost of Confiscation: Millions of Dollars, No Sense

Last November, Bill Blair, the federal Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, refused to answer questions about the costs associated with the Liberal Government’s gun ban and confiscation program imposed by Order-in-Council on May 1, 2020.

Minister Blair’s department is responsible for implementing the ban and overseeing the confiscation of previously lawful firearms from millions of Canadian hunters, sports shooters, farmers and hobbyists before a two-year “amnesty” period ends on April 30, 2022.

An initial cost estimate of CDN$250 million was given shortly before the Liberal’s gun ban and confiscation law was announced, although Minister Blair had earlier quoted a program cost of between CDN$400 - $600 million. Since then, though, the scope of the ban has expanded considerably: the RCMP has added, to the list of “prohibited” firearms, thousand of guns that weren’t specifically included in the May 1st Order in Council.   

At least one part of the cost is now public. After two prior tenders failed to attract private sector interest, at the end of December IBM Canada Ltd. was awarded the government contract to “develop a range of options and approaches to inform the design and implementation of a potential buyback program for recently prohibited firearms.” The award notice has a listed value of just under CDN$1.2 million and an end-date of March 31, 2021. As indicated in the original tender notice, this “study and design” phase does not include “initiating the delivery of the buy-back program.”

Conservative MP Glen Motz (Medicine Hat-Cardston-Warner), speaking at a November 25 meeting of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security (SECU), repeatedly pressed Minister Blair for the cost of the confiscation program, referring to the initial $250M estimate. Starting at 16:06:35 in the video, he asks, “Do you have the numbers for the total costs of what this buyback program will cost Canadians?” “Can you provide us an estimate of what the administration costs for the RCMP and your Public Safety Department will be to run this program? Any idea whatsoever?” “How much do you estimate it will cost, of taxpayer dollars, to now pay back the confiscated firearms owners…?” (Getting somewhat impatient with the lack of answers, he adds a softball question, “[H]ow much [do] you estimate it will cost to buy back the guns from criminals lined up to turn in their illegal firearms?”)

While throwing around clunky phrases like “cost effective in a different way,” “real good public value,” and the intent to “very responsibly fulfill our responsibilities” to licensed firearm owners, the minister declined to provide anything even close to an actual number.  

As we’ve pointed out before, given the track record that Liberal gun-control measures have in Canada, the economic impact of this program is of interest to all Canadian taxpayers, regardless of the specific harm it will cause to licensed gun owners and the firearm industry. Who can forget the spectacularly pointless national gun registry, which started out with an estimated price tag of CDN$2 million but ended up costing taxpayers at least CDN$2.7 billion?    

According to the Canadian Taxpayers Federation (CTF), a grassroots advocacy group pushing for lower taxes, less waste and accountable governments, Justin Trudeau’s Liberal government has already broken the National Debt Clock by running the debt beyond a trillion dollars. “Our National Debt Clock no longer has enough digits to display the size of our federal debt, because nobody ever dreamed the debt would grow this big.” The CTF adds that the “federal debt is currently increasing by over $10,000 per second, $43 million per hour or $1 billion every day. Each Canadian’s individual share of the federal debt is over $26,000.”

Consistent with its mission of eliminating government waste and useless spending of millions of taxpayer dollars, the CTF calls for “scrap[ping] the gun ban and buy back.” Not only was it “wrong” to impose this program without a vote of the country’s elected representatives, this “expensive policy arbitrarily bans and buys guns owned by law-abiding Canadians” without taking away “illegal guns from criminals.” The group has also joined in a court challenge brought against the measure by Cassandra Parker. 

In a podcast on the federal ban and confiscation program, Todd MacKay, Prairie Director of the CTF, mentions (at around the 24:25 mark) that the CTF did an analysis of the funding that would be necessary given the initial estimates of approximately CDN $200 million. “We’ve talked to some of our counterparts in New Zealand. Based on that, we’re guessing that it’s going to go well over a billion dollars.”

Humorist P.J. O’Rourke once wrote, about government waste, that contrary to the popular perception of sloth and inefficiency, “[e]normous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.” This program is possibly off to a fine start. One source estimates that over CDN$3 million was spent last year to mail licensed gun owners a form letter that had no legal effect and was later the subject of a retraction or clarification on the RCMP website.             

IN THIS ARTICLE
Canada Gun Confiscation
TRENDING NOW
H.R. 127 – A Bill Designed to Express Hostility Toward Law-Abiding Gun Owners

News  

Thursday, February 11, 2021

H.R. 127 – A Bill Designed to Express Hostility Toward Law-Abiding Gun Owners

All gun control bills share the same basic goal: a world in which fewer people own firearms. Some bills simply ban certain types of firearms or ammunition outright. Others place obstacles in the path of ...

March for Our Lives Issues Biden His Marching Orders

News  

Monday, March 1, 2021

March for Our Lives Issues Biden His Marching Orders

It’s widely understood that the current occupants of the White House, the Biden-Harris Administration, have positioned themselves as the most anti-gun team this country has ever seen on Pennsylvania Avenue. Leading up to the 2020 ...

Report: House of Representatives to Vote on Two Gun Control Bills!

News  

Tuesday, March 2, 2021

Report: House of Representatives to Vote on Two Gun Control Bills!

According to reports from Capitol Hill, the Democrat-controlled U.S. House of Representatives plans to vote on two gun control bills as early as next week. The first bill, so-called “universal” background check legislation, would criminalize ...

Second Amendment Skeptic Merrick Garland Moves Closer to Confirmation as U.S. Attorney General

News  

Monday, March 1, 2021

Second Amendment Skeptic Merrick Garland Moves Closer to Confirmation as U.S. Attorney General

This week, hearings were held on the nomination of Merrick Garland for U.S. attorney general, with a final vote on confirmation expected to come next week. The prospect for gun owners is that the nation’s ...

The California Model: Soft on Violent Firearm Crimes, Hard on Law-Abiding Gun Owners

News  

Monday, March 1, 2021

The California Model: Soft on Violent Firearm Crimes, Hard on Law-Abiding Gun Owners

A frustrating aspect of the modern gun control movement is its seeming abandonment of reason. The same anti-gun politicians that attack the rights of law-abiding gun owners will advocate for more lenient treatment of those ...

Friday, February 5, 2021

Florida Alert! H.R. 127 - Federal Gun Control Proposal

Much is being said about H.R. 127 By Shelia Jackson Lee (D-TX) 117th Congress and we have had many folks contacting us seeking information. 

Ninth Circuit to Hear Case Challenging California’s Magazine Ban En Banc

News  

Friday, February 26, 2021

Ninth Circuit to Hear Case Challenging California’s Magazine Ban En Banc

Yesterday, the Ninth Circuit granted en banc review of an NRA-ILA backed lawsuit challenging California’s ban on magazines containing more than ten rounds.

NRA Victory in Washington Court of Appeals

News  

Monday, February 22, 2021

NRA Victory in Washington Court of Appeals

The National Rifle Association's Institute for Legislative Action applauds a decision by the Washington Court of Appeals today that upheld the state's preemption law and struck down a pair of local ordinances that restricted the ...

New Hampshire: House Passes Self-Defense Legislation

Friday, February 26, 2021

New Hampshire: House Passes Self-Defense Legislation

Yesterday, the House of Representatives held a floor vote on self-defense legislation, House Bill 197. 

Anti-gun Senators and Mayors Push Biden on Executive Gun Controls

News  

Monday, February 22, 2021

Anti-gun Senators and Mayors Push Biden on Executive Gun Controls

Following a year filled with the COVID-19 pandemic and widespread civil unrest, Americans are in no rush to enact further gun controls. According to data from a January Gallup poll, 42 percent of Americans are satisfied ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.