Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Bloomberg Course: Ineffective Policies and Non-Existent Technology

Friday, June 14, 2019

Bloomberg Course: Ineffective Policies and Non-Existent Technology

This week in the online course “Reducing Gun Violence in America: Evidence for Change” is a real rollercoaster. Week Five is titled “Regulating Gun Design, Enforcing Gun Laws, and Reducing Police-Involved Shootings” covers so-called assault weapons, smart guns, and technology so cutting edge it doesn’t even actually exist. There are several unexpected acknowledgements of reality this week, and we’ll point those out whenever possible. We’d like to be fair to the Bloomberg School and we know our readers appreciate brief rays of sunshine in a storm of nonsense.

Doctor Alex McCourt lectures on so-called “assault weapons” and admits that they are rarely used in crime. This unfortunately starts off a common theme this week: blaming a policy’s lack of impact on some fact other than the easy truth that criminals don’t follow gun laws. McCourt laments the ability of gun manufacturers to design firearms that were not prohibited under the 1994 ban as well as the fact that law-abiding gun owners were allowed to “continue owning that assault weapon for the duration of the ban.” McCourt brings up an analysis of that 1994 ban but neglects to mention the key finding: the ban had no impact on crime.

Next up is a comparatively lengthy presentation on so-called smart guns. Doctor Daniel Webster and Doctor Cassandra Crifasi spend twenty minutes talking about smart guns and they are – surprisingly – not wholeheartedly endorsing “smart gun” mandates. The NRA’s primary objection to so-called smart guns centers on governments mandating the sale of unreliable firearms, but Webster and Crifasi report that increased sales of smart guns may lead to more suicides, as the number of gun owners would increase. In public health terms, more people would be exposed to firearms. The description sounds like an outbreak of legally owned firearms. Crifasi does mention, in passing, gun owners’ concerns about reliability but the Bloomberg School staffers spend more time discussing how the increased cost of so-called smart guns is a barrier to adoption.

The presentation on smart guns was surprising in that the Bloomberg crew was not firmly behind the concept. Smart guns are just that – a concept. A different and somehow less realistic concept is presented as fact when Joshua Horwitz talks about microstamping. Horwitz’s biography on the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence website claims “his research and advocacy were instrumental in enacting a first-of-its-kind microstamping law in California. This revolutionary technology allows law enforcement to trace guns from expended cartridge casings left at crime scenes.” That’s a bold claim to make considering the technology does not exist. In reality, any criminal in possession of such a firearm could just file off the microstamp or pick up his or her shell casings. Horwitz’s pet project could be so easily defeated by criminals – if the technology actually existed – that it clearly only serves as a mechanism to drive up the cost of firearms for law-abiding gun owners and to reduce the number of firearms legally available for purchase in California.

An approach that does exist is focused deterrence, and this is another bright spot in the Bloomberg School program. Webster says that he thinks focused deterrence is the intervention that has the most consistent strong evidence of reducing “gun violence.” The concept of focused deterrence is simple. Law enforcement often know who are involved in gang activity, or they identify people who should be targeted by these deterrence programs. The targets – think gang members, people on probation or parole, and other people who are likely involved in criminal activity – are then invited to a meeting where law enforcement essentially tells them “‘we know who you are, do not shoot. You and your network should not shoot. Take this message back to your community and share it, because we will come down hard on you.’” Stiff penalties are imposed after violence, but resources are made available to help the targets and their networks change their criminal lifestyle. Such programs have been successful in large cities across the country.

Of course, this is a Bloomberg School program so gun control is the answer. A lecture on prohibited persons and the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) quickly turns into a Bloomberg talking point about private sales. The argument is that so-called universal background checks don’t work because they’re not commonly used and so prohibited people can still acquire firearms. Except we know where criminals get their guns, and it isn’t through private sales. Interestingly, this presentation came after those on focused deterrence. It isn’t a secret that focusing on criminals yields public safety results but this presenter is still pushing a policy that has been found to be ineffective.

Crifasi says in the weekly wrap-up presentation, “You can design the best prevention strategies, but there will always be people who will want to harm someone else or otherwise violate the law, and we need to have structures to hold them accountable but it needs to be done in a Constitutional, fair, and effective way.”

We have those structures – an entire system dedicated to investigating crime and punishing those responsible. Still, that’s the most refreshing acknowledgement we’ll probably ever see from the Bloomberg School.

 

 

 

 

 

 

TRENDING NOW
Oregon: Initiative Filed to Restrict Self-Defense

Friday, July 19, 2019

Oregon: Initiative Filed to Restrict Self-Defense

On July 18th, Initiative Petition 40​ was filed in Oregon to restrict the Second Amendment rights of law abiding adults by imposing a broad, one-size-fits-all method of storing firearms.  This egregious attack on our freedoms uses virtually ...

“Fact Checker:” Joe Biden’s “Gun Ban” Not a Gun Ban Because Some Guns Wouldn’t Be Banned

News  

Monday, July 15, 2019

“Fact Checker:” Joe Biden’s “Gun Ban” Not a Gun Ban Because Some Guns Wouldn’t Be Banned

Facebook has teamed up with what it calls “third-party fact-checkers” to punish users of its platform that post information embarrassing or inconvenient to the political outlook of its principals. Yet like most sources of what ...

Highly Touted Study Tests Non-Existent Policies, Uses Deceptive Data

News  

Monday, July 22, 2019

Highly Touted Study Tests Non-Existent Policies, Uses Deceptive Data

A study published in the journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics this week generated considerable media attention that focused on the purported finding and not the underlying research design:

NYC Makes Second Bid to Shake Off Supreme Court Scrutiny

News  

Monday, July 22, 2019

NYC Makes Second Bid to Shake Off Supreme Court Scrutiny

Apparently cognizant of the risks of pressing ahead with the defense of its nonsensical and extreme firearm law, New York City has now ramped up its arguments that the legal challenge to the law is ...

Hollywood Fantasy v. Reality on Firearm Suppressors

News  

Monday, July 15, 2019

Hollywood Fantasy v. Reality on Firearm Suppressors

It’s no secret that Hollywood has a very loose relationship with reality.  The movie industry, after all, is based on fantasy and escapism, and that’s not necessarily a bad thing.  If someone wants to forget ...

Presidential Pretender Who Campaigned on Gun Control First to Call It Quits

News  

Monday, July 15, 2019

Presidential Pretender Who Campaigned on Gun Control First to Call It Quits

On Monday, Eric Swalwell became the first of the many pretenders for the Democrat presidential nomination to bow (or perhaps slink) out of the race. The U.S. Congressman from California’s 15th District had tried to distinguish himself from ...

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

Gun Laws  

Thursday, January 1, 2015

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

CAUTION: Federal and state firearms laws are subject to frequent change. This summary is not to be considered as legal advice or a restatement of law.

NRA Statement On Virginia Special Session

News  

Tuesday, July 9, 2019

NRA Statement On Virginia Special Session

FAIRFAX, Va.–   The interim executive director of the National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action, Jason Ouimet, released the following statement today regarding the special session in Virginia:  "The National Rifle Association has a long ...

Virginia: Crime Commission Hearing Dates Set

Tuesday, July 16, 2019

Virginia: Crime Commission Hearing Dates Set

As directed by the General Assembly during the July 9th special session, the Virginia State Crime Commission will be holding hearings on August 19th and 20th to evaluate Governor Ralph Northam’s proposed gun control bills. 

HR 218/Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act (LEOSA)

Gun Laws  

Sunday, May 11, 2014

HR 218/Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act (LEOSA)

LEOSA, as Amended by the National Defense Authorization Act of 2013 (Jan 2, 2013) (Changes have been italicized.) § 926B.

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.