Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

With Proposed Federal Legislation, Anti-gun Advocates Seek to Impose May-Issue Gun Ownership

Thursday, May 2, 2019

With Proposed Federal Legislation, Anti-gun Advocates Seek to Impose May-Issue Gun Ownership

In 1987, only ten states had concealed carry laws that treated the Right-to-Carry in a manner consistent with our constitutional right to bear arms. Understanding that the whims and prejudices of government officials are incompatible with the proper recognition of a constitutional right, in the following three decades NRA and our members have worked to replace discretionary may-issue concealed carry permitting statutes with shall-issue Right-to-Carry laws. Today, 42 states and even the District of Columbia have Right-to-Carry laws that grant permits to law-abiding residents.

Given all of the success in removing government subjectivity in the Right-to-Carry permitting process, it would be easy for gun owners to miss ongoing anti-gun efforts to restrict our rights. Recent legislation passed by the U.S. House of Representatives, for example, would enhance the federal government’s power to block gun sales for those who are not prohibited from possessing firearms. The legislation threatens to set up a new system of may-issue gun ownership.

On February 27, the U.S. House passed H.R. 8, which would criminalize the private transfer of firearms. Under the legislation, almost all firearms transfers, including those among extended family and friends, would be required to take place pursuant to a National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) check on the transferee.

A day later, the House passed H.R. 1112.

Under current law, if a NICS check is delayed for further research and the FBI’s NICS section is unable to determine that the prospective firearm transferee is prohibited from possessing firearms under federal or state law three business days after the check was initiated by a firearms dealer, the firearms transfer may proceed at the dealer's option. This importantly encourages the federal government to conduct NICS checks in an efficient manner and prevents the government from arbitrarily denying an individual their Second Amendment rights through an indefinite delay.

H.R. 1112, on the other hand, would eliminate the three-day provision and turn this crucial protection on its head. Under the legislation, if after ten business days a firearms dealer does not receive an order to proceed with the firearm transfer from the FBI, the prospective transferee would then have to petition the ATF to allow the transfer to proceed. Following the appeal, the dealer would not be permitted to proceed with the transaction until another ten business days have elapsed following the date of the petition.

As a practical matter, this poses a severe problem for those who are delayed. Under current law, a NICS check is only valid for 30 calendar days after the date it is initiated. Given that H.R. 1112 uses business days, during many parts of the year it would be impossible for a transferee to comply with the proposed petition scheme and still be eligible to receive the firearm upon its completion, as the initial NICS check would expire in the meantime.

The combination of H.R. 8 and H.R. 1112 poses an insidious threat to Second Amendment rights. First, H.R. 8 cuts off the ability to lawfully access firearms without government interference by funneling nearly all firearms transfers into the NICS process. Second, H.R. 1112 invites the FBI to effectively deny people who are not barred by federal law from possessing firearms by holding their background checks open indefinitely.

The government has already used NICS delays to frustrate some lawful gun sales. A 2013 report from the Congressional Research Service, for example, explained how it was standard practice to delay NICS transactions involving those on the government’s secret watchlists. The American Civil Liberties Union has pointed out that the government’s secret watchlists are “based on vague, overbroad, and often secret standards and evidence.” In these cases, government bureaucrats have substituted their own discretion for federal law.

Moreover, patriotic gun owners would do well to consider that during the Obama administration, the Department of Homeland Security issued a report entitled, “Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment” that made specific reference to “disgruntled military veterans” and those who oppose further restrictions on Second Amendment rights. If the federal government is empowered to effectively deny firearm transfers through indefinite delays, there is no telling where that might end.

The vague and unpredictable exercise of government subjectivity, influenced all too often by a political agenda, is irreconcilable with the full recognition of a constitutional right. H.R. 8 and H.R. 1112 would allow the government to eliminate the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding gun owners. We have worked too hard to expand recognition of the Right-to-Carry with shall-issue laws only to see all gun ownership subjected to a may-issue regime.

Chris W. Cox

BY Chris W. Cox

NRA-ILA Executive Director

Follow This Contributor

Chris W. Cox has served as the executive director of the Institute for Legislative Action, the political and lobbying arm of NRA, since 2002. As NRA’s principal political strategist, Cox oversees eight NRA-ILA divisions: Federal Affairs; State & Local Affairs; Public Affairs; Grassroots; Finance; Research & Information; Conservation, Wildlife & Natural Resources; and Office of Legislative Counsel. Cox also serves as chairman of NRA’s Political Victory Fund (NRA-PVF), the Association’s political action committee; president of the NRA Freedom Action Foundation (NRA-FAF), which focuses on non-partisan voter registration and citizen education; and chairman of NRA Country, an effort to bring country music artists together with NRA members in support of our Second Amendment freedoms and hunting heritage.

TRENDING NOW
Beto Going All-In on Confiscation

News  

Sunday, September 15, 2019

Beto Going All-In on Confiscation

Democrat Presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke continues to struggle to gain any sort of traction for his campaign. With some polls putting him in 10th place, and his average sitting around 7th, some might say that it is desperation ...

Tell Your Lawmakers: No Semi-Auto and Magazine Ban!

News  

Sunday, September 15, 2019

Tell Your Lawmakers: No Semi-Auto and Magazine Ban!

The Democrat Party is now so aligned with gun control that every major candidate running for its 2020 presidential nomination recently appeared in a propaganda video produced by one of the nation’s most active firearm prohibition groups. ...

NASCAR Takes a Hard Left

News  

Friday, August 30, 2019

NASCAR Takes a Hard Left

After decades of NASCAR drivers literally turning left for hours every race day (road course races excluded, of course), the governing body appears to be taking a figurative left turn, politically. K-Var, a retailer in outdoor and ...

House Democrats Continue Unprecedented Push for More Gun Control

News  

Sunday, September 15, 2019

House Democrats Continue Unprecedented Push for More Gun Control

As was continually threatened while Congress was on its six-week Summer break, House Democrats hastily convened a hearing on Tuesday to promote their latest batch of anti-gun bills.  The House Judiciary Committee’s markup of three bills, ...

NRA Files Suit Against San Francisco for Violating First Amendment

News  

Sunday, September 15, 2019

NRA Files Suit Against San Francisco for Violating First Amendment

On September 3, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors smeared millions of law-abiding Americans by unanimously adopting a resolution that designated NRA a “domestic terrorist organization.” Less than one week later, on September 9, NRA filed a federal lawsuit ...

Playing Games with Numbers

News  

Sunday, September 15, 2019

Playing Games with Numbers

Stanford Law Professor John Donohue and Theodora Boulouta, a Stanford undergrad, wrote an opinion piece in the New York Times that claims their new research shows the 1994 “assault weapons” ban really did work.  Their finding is ...

San Francisco Board of Supervisors Declares NRA a “Domestic Terrorist Organization”

News  

Sunday, September 8, 2019

San Francisco Board of Supervisors Declares NRA a “Domestic Terrorist Organization”

On September 3, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors unanimously passed a resolution, “declaring that the National Rifle Association is a domestic terrorist organization and urging other cities, states, and the federal government to do the same.”The resolution was ...

California: 2019 Legislative Session Adjourns

Sunday, September 15, 2019

California: 2019 Legislative Session Adjourns

The California Legislature has adjourned the 2019 session resulting in the final passage of AB 12, AB 61, AB 879, AB 893, AB 1254, AB 1297, AB 1669, SB 61 and SB 172 which are now eligible ...

News  

Friday, September 13, 2019

NRA Statement on Texas Governor's Safety Action Report

The National Rifle Association released the following statement on Friday regarding Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's Texas Safety Action Report:   

Monday, August 19, 2019

Florida Alert! "Assault Weapons" Ban Amendment Bans ALL SEMIAUTOMATIC RIFLES AND SHOTGUNS

The so-called "assault weapons" ban that is proposed for a constitutional amendment to be on the 2020 Election Ballot bans the possession of: “any semiautomatic rifle or shotgun CAPABLE of holding more than ten (10) rounds ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.