Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN Legal & Legislation

The NRA Petitions for Much-Needed Structure on Important Fish and Game Committee

Friday, September 26, 2014

To prevent continued procedural abuses by a government body involved in crafting hunting policy, the NRA has petitioned the California Fish and Game Commission (CFGC) to establish and publish rules for the way its Wildlife Resources Committee (WRC) conducts business.  The Safari Club International and the National Shooting Sports Foundation also have submitted letters expressing concern about the issues raised in the NRA’s Petition.

 

Anti-hunting groups have obtained unprecedented access to certain sympathetic state Fish and Game Commissioners and staffers through the recently created WRC.  The WRC replaced the Al Taucher Committee, which had for years provided a forum for hunters to meaningfully participate as stakeholders in the regulatory process. The CFGC characterizes the WRC as a “forum” for public comment, and a “workshop” for discussing regulatory matters that will eventually go before the Fish and Game Commission.  But the WRC has instead limited the opportunity for input from hunting stakeholder groups and operated as a platform for anti-hunting activists, giving them a regulatory foothold to promote their radical and unbalanced approach to wildlife management that could eventually make most game hunting unsustainable in California.

 

One of the major goals of the anti-hunting extremists is to change the focus of the CFGC’s activities from regulating hunting as a wildlife management tool to restricting public use of natural resources to only “non-consumptive” uses (translation: no hunting).  These efforts are being promoted by groups that want to allow all predator species populations to increase unchecked, at the expense of game species and without regard for a balanced approach that would keep hunting sustainable.

                                               

When the WRC held their inaugural meeting in June of 2013, there was little public notice of what was to be discussed.  A subcommittee stacked with anti-hunting activists was formed, giving anti-hunting groups the opportunity to submit a regulatory “wishlist” to a subset of the CFGC without meaningful participation from hunting stakeholder groups.  It is insulting that no hunters or hunting association representatives were put on this subcommittee.

 

The WRC currently has no procedural rules and this invites abuses of its functions.  Without procedural rules, there is no way for people to know if the WRC is being used to “piecemeal” the CFGC’s meeting agendas, and there is no way for the public to know if the CFGC is going to restrict public comment on controversial issues (after the fact) to WRC meetings only.  It is still unclear whether the CFGC plans to provide substantial review of any “recommendations” that come from the WRC.

 

The WRC is currently made up of two Fish & Game Commissioners.  But Commissioner Sutton, who has many sportsmen concerned because of anti-hunting views that he has exhibited in the past, is now trying to create an unnecessary exception that allows him to sit on the WRC as a voting “alternate” member.  The WRC is not required to hold meetings at all, nor is it required to have even one WRC Committee member at meetings.  So there is no reason for an alternate “member” position to be created.  But without rules, there’s nothing to stop it.  There are serious concerns that Commissioner Sutton is attempting to join the WRC so that he can control the agenda!

 

If the CFGC does not resolve the imbalances and bias that plagues the WRC, the NRA is prepared to take legal action to ensure that the anti-hunter agenda does not override common sense and a balanced wildlife management approach.  The NRA and other hunters’ stakeholder groups have put the CFGC on notice of multiple procedural and substantive problems with the way the WRC currently operates.

 

The next Fish and Game Commission meeting will take place on October 8 in Mount Shasta. Their meeting agenda is available here.

 

TRENDING NOW
Illinois: House Committee Passes Bill to Close Local Gun Dealers

Tuesday, May 16, 2017

Illinois: House Committee Passes Bill to Close Local Gun Dealers

The House Judiciary Committee passed Senate Bill 1657 by a 7-6 vote.

From My Cold Wet Hands: Humorless Scold Targets Squirt Guns

News  

Friday, May 19, 2017

From My Cold Wet Hands: Humorless Scold Targets Squirt Guns

We have yet to reach Memorial Day, but the fun police have already set their sights on at least one cherished summer childhood activity. In an article for Pupsugar.com, titled, “Why Kids Should Never Play ...

Court's Commonsense Conclusion: "There Was a Gun" Isn't Enough to Justify Issuing a Restraining Order

Second Amendment  

Friday, May 19, 2017

Court's Commonsense Conclusion: "There Was a Gun" Isn't Enough to Justify Issuing a Restraining Order

The Supreme Court of North Dakota confirmed this week that simply possessing a handgun while on one’s own private property cannot support a finding of "disorderly conduct" under the state’s disorderly conduct restraining order law. ...

Bloomberg's Everytown Creates "Authors Council" to Push Anti-Gun Propaganda

News  

Friday, May 19, 2017

Bloomberg's Everytown Creates "Authors Council" to Push Anti-Gun Propaganda

As if the country’s media weren’t already sufficiently co-opted by anti-gun advocates, this week, Michael Bloomberg’s Everytown for Gun Safety announced an effort to pervert an additional facet of American entertainment. The billionaire bank-rolled interest group has ...

California: Draft "Assault Weapon" Regulation Language Now Available

Thursday, May 18, 2017

California: Draft "Assault Weapon" Regulation Language Now Available

Today, May 18, a draft copy of the "Assault Weapon" regulations has been made available

Federal Lawsuit Challenging California’s Ban on Standard Capacity Magazines Filed

Thursday, May 18, 2017

Federal Lawsuit Challenging California’s Ban on Standard Capacity Magazines Filed

Today, May 18, the National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA) announced it is supporting, along with the California Rifle and Pistol Association (CRPA), an important Second Amendment lawsuit challenging California’s ban on the possession ...

Nevada: Anti-Gun Bills Fail to Pass Second Chamber Policy Committee Deadline

Friday, May 19, 2017

Nevada: Anti-Gun Bills Fail to Pass Second Chamber Policy Committee Deadline

Today, May 19, was the second chamber policy committee deadline.  Two anti-gun bills, Senate Bill 115 and Senate Bill 387, both failed to pass out of the Assembly Judiciary Committee and are now dead for the 2017 legislative ...

Illinois: Last Chance to Save your Local Gun Dealer!

Tuesday, May 2, 2017

Illinois: Last Chance to Save your Local Gun Dealer!

The Illinois House of Representatives may consider Senate Bill 1657, legislation that could put your local gun dealer out of business, at any time! It is imperative that you contact your state Representative IMMEDIATELY and ...

New York: Outrageous Insurance Bill Headlines Long List of Anti-Gun Bills

Monday, March 13, 2017

New York: Outrageous Insurance Bill Headlines Long List of Anti-Gun Bills

The yearly onslaught of anti-gun legislation in the Empire State is concrete proof that anti-gun politicians will never be satisfied until guns are completely banned.  Even though Albany lawmakers passed arguably the nation’s harshest gun ...

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

Gun Laws  

Thursday, January 1, 2015

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

CAUTION: Federal and state firearms laws are subject to frequent change. This summary is not to be considered as legal advice or a restatement of law.

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -
NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.