Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

CNN: Piers Morgan Out--Sarah Brady In

Friday, February 28, 2014

Like certain other TV networks, CNN likes gun control supporters. For more than a year, it allowed Piers Morgan to relentlessly and viciously attack the Second Amendment and anyone who supports it, until Morgan's perennially low-rated show had cost the network so much in lost advertising revenue that keeping him on the air was no longer financially sustainable.

As noted in the previous Alert story, CNN recently made the decision to cut "Piers Morgan Live" from its lineup. However, from the network's perspective, the problem was the messenger, not the message.

So, this week, with Morgan on the way out, CNN teamed with another anti-gun messenger—Sarah Brady, chairwoman of the anti-gun Brady Campaign--to promote federal legislation that would require a background check, through the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS), on anyone who acquires a firearm from someone who is not a firearm dealer. Mrs. Brady was on CNN and wrote an opinion piece for CNN's website, because today is the 20-year anniversary of the Brady Act, which created NICS.

It's funny how things change, however. The Brady Campaign originally opposed NICS.

A little history is in order. The Brady Campaign started out in 1974 as the National Council to Control Handguns (NCCH), and made no attempt to conceal the fact that as far as it was concerned, "Control" meant "Ban." In 1976, the group's then-leader, Nelson Shields, stated that the group envisioned a three-part plan to ban handguns, and the first part of the plan was to slow down handgun sales.

NCCH renamed itself Handgun Control, Inc. (HCI), in 1979, notwithstanding its claim that the name change occurred in 1980. A decade later, HCI was still trying to slow down handgun sales, and figured that the way to do it was with a waiting period.

While Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush were in the White House, waiting period legislation stalled. By 1993, however, gun control supporter Bill Clinton was president, and to help their party's leader, many Democrats suddenly began supporting legislation proposing to allow state and local law enforcement officials to delay handgun purchases for up to five days.

Congress ultimately passed the legislation, named the "Brady Bill", but before it did so it approved an amendment by Rep. George Gekas (R-Pa.), requiring the waiting period provisions to end after five years, in favor of what we now know as NICS. HCI opposed the amendment vigorously.

Meanwhile, anti-gun groups had been undergoing a change in one aspect of their thinking. Realizing Americans didn't take kindly to the word "control," but that practically everyone is opposed to arbitrary "violence," the National Coalition to Ban Handguns (NCBH) renamed itself the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence in 1989, the New Right Watch (consisting of a former NCBH and Amnesty International activist and one or two colleagues) renamed itself the Violence Policy Center in 1989 or 1990, gun control supporters began referring to gun control as "gun safety" or "gun violence legislation,"  HCI renamed itself the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence in 2001, and a handful of anti-gun lawyers in San Francisco formed themselves as the Legal Community to Prevent Gun Violence, then, realizing that "community" was a bit of an exaggeration, renamed themselves Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence.

The Brady Campaign, which initially opposed NICS, now calls NICS checks "Brady checks," and proposes that they be applied to people who purchase firearms from people who are not firearm dealers.

The reason for the shift brings us to the second part of the three-part plan that NCCH outlined in 1976: registration, to be followed by the final step, prohibiting handgun ownership. Registration might not be politically possible right now. But gun control supporters understand that if all firearm transactions could be run through NICS, and subsequently all NICS check data could be kept by the federal government indefinitely and such data be made to include the make, model and serial number of firearms purchased, over time, a registry of firearm ownership could be established.

Other than the fact that today is the Brady Act's anniversary, now is not a very good time for gun control advocates to be campaigning for more gun control, however. The FBI's preliminary crime report for the first half of 2013 suggests that the nation's murder rate has fallen to a point lower than any time since the 1950s, and its month-by-month NICS report shows that the decrease in crime has coincided with a dramatic increase in firearm purchases.  Further, Americans' zeal to pass gun control laws is exceptionally low, and a recent Gallup poll shows that the country's overall dissatisfaction with U.S. gun laws and policies has increased to 55 percent this year (up from 51 percent last year), but the increase came largely from Americans who say that gun laws are too strict

In the piece she wrote for CNN, Mrs. Brady said "a lot has changed over the past two decades, and people who wouldn't pass a background check have found other ways to procure guns easily through unlicensed sales at gun shows or on the Internet, where background checks are not required." Contradicting Mrs. Brady, federal studies show that criminals still tend to get guns like they always have: by stealing them, buying them on the black market, or getting friends and family members who can pass background checks to buy guns for them--reasons why expanding the background check requirement makes no sense from a crime prevention perspective.

A Washington Post blogger, Jamie Fuller, also noted that things have changed over the last 20 years, but did a better job of describing the changes than Mrs. Brady. Over the last 20 years, Fuller pointed out, support for gun control has decreased, support for protecting the individual right to arms has increased, gun control restrictions have been reduced, and the firearm murder rate has been cut in half. Fuller didn't mention it, but probably should have, that Americans bought over 120 million firearms over the same period.

TRENDING NOW
Out-of-Touch Mayor Learns the Hard Way Michiganders Like Guns and Dogs

News  

Monday, March 2, 2026

Out-of-Touch Mayor Learns the Hard Way Michiganders Like Guns and Dogs

“The NRA is going to be mad at me.”  So said David LaGrand (D), mayor of the second largest city in the state of Michigan. We don’t get mad, however, when firearm prohibitionists reveal their true ...

Gunmakers Petition High Court to Halt Illegitimate Attacks on Firearms Industry

News  

Monday, March 2, 2026

Gunmakers Petition High Court to Halt Illegitimate Attacks on Firearms Industry

In recent months, NRA-ILA has impressed upon gun owners the severe danger to Second Amendment rights posed by efforts to undermine the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA). 

NRA Announces Third Lawsuit Challenging the National Firearms Act

Thursday, February 26, 2026

NRA Announces Third Lawsuit Challenging the National Firearms Act

Today, the National Rifle Association announced the filing of a third lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA). The case, Roberts v. ATF, was filed in the U.S. District Court for ...

Virginia Gun Owners Face Magazine Confiscation!

Monday, February 2, 2026

Virginia Gun Owners Face Magazine Confiscation!

Astute Virginia gun owners anticipated terrible gun control legislation from the 2026 General Assembly. Still, some may be shocked to learn that anti-rights zealots in the Virginia Senate have advanced a bill to CONFISCATE standard capacity firearm ...

Iowa: Senate Strips Carry Protections for Iowans, Expands Its Own Authority

Tuesday, February 24, 2026

Iowa: Senate Strips Carry Protections for Iowans, Expands Its Own Authority

Yesterday, on the Senate floor, SF 2263 was amended, at the last minute, to remove key provisions that would have expanded protections for law-abiding gun owners before the bill ultimately passed. Click the Take Action button ...

California: Lawmakers Introduce New Bill that Would Censor Private 3-D Printers

Tuesday, February 24, 2026

California: Lawmakers Introduce New Bill that Would Censor Private 3-D Printers

Last week marked the deadline for bill introductions in the California Legislature. As we anticipated in our previous alert, anti-gun lawmakers used this opportunity to file additional measures aimed at further restricting the rights of ...

Colorado: Gun Bill Votes In Both Chambers TODAY

Tuesday, February 24, 2026

Colorado: Gun Bill Votes In Both Chambers TODAY

Today, February 24th, both chambers of the legislature will hold votes on anti-gun legislation. Please contact your legislators and urge them to OPPOSE HB 26-1144 and SB 26-043 by using the TAKE ACTION buttons below.

Oregon: Ballot Measure 114 Override Bill Passes House

Wednesday, February 25, 2026

Oregon: Ballot Measure 114 Override Bill Passes House

This afternoon, House Bill 4145, the Ballot Measure 114 override bill, passed out of the House and will be transmitted to the Senate for further consideration.

Virginia: Gun Bill Updates As Crossover Deadline Arrives

Tuesday, February 17, 2026

Virginia: Gun Bill Updates As Crossover Deadline Arrives

Today, February 17th is the legislative crossover deadline in Virginia, and any bills that have not left their chamber of origin by the end of the day are considered dead for the session.

North Carolina: Permitless Carry Veto Override Vote Postponed

Tuesday, January 13, 2026

North Carolina: Permitless Carry Veto Override Vote Postponed

Today, the North Carolina House of Representatives rescheduled this morning’s veto override on Senate Bill 50, Freedom to Carry NC, to February 9, 2026.

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.