Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

MPD Continues Selective Enforcement to Promote Gun Control?

Friday, October 18, 2013

Washington, D.C., has some of the strictest gun laws in the nation.  This is no accident.  Following the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, which invalidated the District's bans on handguns and on possession of operable firearms in the home for self-defense, the D.C. Council immediately went to work on creating the strictest guns laws they could think of, supposedly to "comply" with the Court's decision.  Litigation on those laws began almost immediately and continues to this day.

At the centerpiece of D.C.'s gun control regime is an elaborate registration scheme, the absurdities of which have been highlighted by media outlets such as the Washington Post and the Washington Times, and most recently in the book Emily Gets Her Gun, by Washington Times senior opinion editor, Emily Miller. 

Possession of an unregistered firearm is a crime in Washington, D.C.  Carrying even a registered firearm outside one's home is also presumptively unlawful.  Various categories of firearms, as well as certain magazines, are banned and ineligible for registration.  Transfer or disposal of a firearm, except to, or by, a federally-licensed dealer (FFL), is strictly prohibited.  If the recipient of a transferred firearm is not an FFL, he or she must possess a registration certificate for it.  Even possession of a single round of ammunition by a person without a registration certificate is a crime, and "ammunition" includes not just intact cartridges and shells, but their individual components as well.

The Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) strictly enforces these rules.  Media outlets have even reported that D.C. police officers are under orders to look for violations of the ammunition ban involving tourists with empty casings or hulls.  As story after story has shown, moreover, no offense is too inconsequential to escape arrest and prosecution, even when officials have absolutely no evidence of violent or criminal intent on the part of the "offender."   

Another trend has become evident, however, as D.C. officials have demonstrated a curious willingness to look the other way on technical violations of these rules when they are committed for the "greater good" of promoting gun control.

The dubious practice of gun turn-ins (often erroneously referred to as "buy-backs," as if the police originally owned all guns and are merely buying back what was formerly theirs) is well known to those who follow the debate over the Second Amendment.  Sometimes they are handled by the police.  Sometimes they are handled by private entities with police cooperation or agreement.  In all cases, however, violations of the law are assumed to occur.  Yet the police are willing to suspend enforcement for these events, supposedly for the greater good of "getting guns off the street." 

During the national debate this year over a proposal to ban so-called "high-capacity magazines," a prominent newsman, during a segment filmed at a D.C. studio, confronted NRA's Wayne LaPierre on national television with a magazine banned under D.C. law.  Although it was later revealed that the newsman had been told by MPD officials that the planned stunt was illegal, he was given a pass and not prosecuted.  After all, the D.C. Attorney General's Office decided, "the intent of the temporary possession and short display of the magazine was to promote the First Amendment purpose of informing an ongoing public debate about firearms policy in the United States."

Only last week, we reported on yet another possible violation of D.C. firearms laws to further this "debate." In that episode, MPD Chief of Police Cathy Lanier delivered several firearms and magazines to Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) to be used as props in Feinstein's bid to re-energize her longstanding campaign to re-enact federal legislation banning so-called "assault weapons."  The MPD was not, however, so solicitous toward Sens. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who were refused permission to bring a hunting rifle and an AR-15 to a debate to illustrate their own points against the proposed ban.

This Sunday, the National Cathedral in Washington, D.C., in conjunction with the Children's Defense Fund, is set to host a "forum on ending the gun violence epidemic."  Speakers will include the president of the American Academy of Pediatrics, which supports a federal assault weapons ban and other gun control measures advocated by Barack Obama.

While that in itself is not particularly noteworthy, and while we certainly recognize the Cathedral's right to advocate for its religious views, what did catch our eye was the Children's Defense Fund's description of another event scheduled to occur after the forum:

"You're invited to join us on the Cathedral grounds after the forum as blacksmiths turn police confiscated guns into garden tools in a modern-day interpretation of the biblical passage about beating swords into plowshares.  These illegal guns will be transformed into life-affirming garden tools that will be donated to community gardens to grow healthy food for families."

This leads us to wonder just how the planners of the event are to obtain these "police confiscated guns" and how this event could possibly be considered legal under D.C. law.  Is the MPD making yet another exception for what it considers the greater good?  While certain exceptions exist even to D.C.'s regulations, we fail to see which of them account for the transfer, possibly by the MPD, of firearms to blacksmiths so they can "beat" on them with their tools in a publicly-accessible demonstration.  Does the MPD consider beating on firearms with tools to present less of a safety risk than an empty shotgun hull in the bed of a pick-up truck traveling through the District?

We can only wonder whether a peaceful counter-demonstration using Joe Biden-approved double-barreled shotguns to extol the virtues of the Second Amendment would be similarly tolerated.  Recent events suggest it would not.

Gun control laws have traditionally been written to be overbroad and then selectively enforced.  Eminent scholars, for example, have shown how this technique was used as a tool of racial oppression during the Reconstruction era.  Certainly D.C.'s gun control laws are overbroad, and increasing evidence suggests they are being selectively enforced to promote a political agenda that seeks to portray firearms as a social scourge to which ever-increasing and more punitive gun control is the answer. 

This is not merely an academic issue for a growing list of political prisoners whose otherwise innocent and non-aggressive conduct put them on the wrong side of D.C.'s gun control.  This includes Baptist Pastor William Duncan, who, on a holiday trip to D.C., found himself and his family (including two small children) on the receiving end of a S.W.A.T. response after he disclosed to a security guard that he had two handguns under the seat of his vehicle.  Like many visitors to the Nation's Capitol, Duncan was unaware that this out-of-state carry permit was not recognized in the District.  Pastor Duncan was arrested, his firearms were confiscated, and he was held over the Independence Day weekend in a D.C. jail.  

Similar stories abound, including that of a Marine amputee who had the misfortune of having a flat tire while driving through Washington, D.C., with a 9mm pistol in his vehicle.  Like Pastor Duncan, Cpl. Melroy H. Cort had an out-of-state license to carry his gun.  At the time of his arrest, he was on his way to an extended stay at Walter Reed Army Medical Center.  His commanding officer had advised him to take the gun to the armory on Walter Reed's base for safekeeping.  Nevertheless, Cpl. Cort was subjected to felony prosecution under D.C.'s firearm laws and eventually convicted of a misdemeanor count of illegal possession of ammunition.

While we could go on and on with these accounts, suffice to say that if the organizers of Sunday's event have not cleared their conduct with the MPD, they face potentially serious consequences.  If they have, and the MPD has determined to stand down or even to participate, we smell a rat.

We certainly hope nobody gets in trouble or has any accidents at the event occurring this Sunday at the National Cathedral.  Nevertheless, we believe that overbroad laws unequally enforced to advance a political agenda constitute an abuse of authority.  If MPD is to carve out exceptions to D.C.'s draconian gun control laws to avoid absurd and unjust consequences, hopefully it will do so on an equal opportunity basis.  Better yet, hopefully the D.C. Council, or the U.S. Congress, will finally embrace the Second Amendment and reform D.C.'s unreasonable firearm laws.

TRENDING NOW
Out of Style: Levi’s Fawns Over Shannon Watts in Pantmaker’s Latest Gun Control Effort

News  

Friday, May 17, 2019

Out of Style: Levi’s Fawns Over Shannon Watts in Pantmaker’s Latest Gun Control Effort

At the National Retail Federation’s 2018 convention in New York City, Levi Strauss & Co. Brand President James Curleigh told those assembled that the multinational pants manufacturer intends to be the “most relevant lifestyle brand.” Evidently, part ...

Gov. Abbott Signs NRA-Backed Tenants' Rights Bill

News  

Friday, May 17, 2019

Gov. Abbott Signs NRA-Backed Tenants' Rights Bill

The National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA) applauded Gov. Greg Abbott on Thursday for signing NRA-backed legislation that protects tenants’ rights by prohibiting “no firearms” clauses in residential leases.   

Trump Administration, Other Pro-Gun Heavyweights Lend Support on Pending Supreme Court Case

News  

Friday, May 17, 2019

Trump Administration, Other Pro-Gun Heavyweights Lend Support on Pending Supreme Court Case

As NRA-ILA Executive Director Chris W. Cox reported in March, the U.S. Supreme Court has taken up a challenge by an NRA state affiliate to a New York City gun control scheme that effectively prohibits lawfully ...

Retired Justice Stevens Continues Crusade Against Guns

News  

Friday, May 17, 2019

Retired Justice Stevens Continues Crusade Against Guns

Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens does not believe a law-abiding citizen has a right to possess firearms under the Second Amendment, and he wants to make sure everyone knows it. He made his ...

NRA Supports Guns Save Life's Challenge to Illinois’s FOID Act

News  

Wednesday, May 15, 2019

NRA Supports Guns Save Life's Challenge to Illinois’s FOID Act

NRA is supporting a legal challenge to Illinois's FOID Act brought by Guns Save Life, an organization dedicated to defending the Second Amendment rights of Illinois residents. 

NRA Applauds Attorneys General and Governors Amicus Brief in Supreme Court Challenge

News  

Thursday, May 16, 2019

NRA Applauds Attorneys General and Governors Amicus Brief in Supreme Court Challenge

NRA Applauds Attorney General and Governors Amicus Brief in Supreme Court Challenge.

Governor Abbott Signs NRA-Backed Tenants' Rights Bill

Friday, May 17, 2019

Governor Abbott Signs NRA-Backed Tenants' Rights Bill

On Thursday, Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 302 by Representative Dennis Paul (R-Houston) & Senator Bryan Hughes (R-Mineola), NRA-supported legislation that prohibits “no firearms” clauses in residential leases.

Hear Ye, Hear Ye, Only What We Want Ye to Hear

News  

Friday, May 17, 2019

Hear Ye, Hear Ye, Only What We Want Ye to Hear

Can we finally put the claim that “gun violence” research is underfunded to rest? The Bloomberg Professor of American Health at the Bloomberg School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins University, Daniel Webster, and his colleagues at the Hopkins ...

Does Shannon Watts want a Ban on all Centerfire Rifle Ammunition?

News  

Friday, May 10, 2019

Does Shannon Watts want a Ban on all Centerfire Rifle Ammunition?

Shannon Watts has developed her persona as a “full-time volunteer” who wants nothing more than to bring “common sense gun laws” to this country. However, she once again reminded gun owners of her true agenda ...

Illinois: Committee To Receive Private Transfer Ban Legislation

Friday, May 17, 2019

Illinois: Committee To Receive Private Transfer Ban Legislation

On May 21st, the Illinois state House of Representatives Rules Committee will hear House Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 1966 and send it to the Judiciary Committee for further consideration.  HA 1 to SB 1966 would ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.