Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

After Election Day 2012: Moving Forward

Tuesday, January 1, 2013

By Chris W. Cox, NRA-ILA Executive Director

Four years ago, an anti-gun activist group celebrated the election of Barack Obama and Joe Biden by proclaiming, “Never in our nation’s history have we had an incoming president and vice president more supportive of strong gun laws.” Now, for reasons that have nothing to do with gun laws, President Obama and Vice President Biden will remain in power for another four years.

Exaggeration has become the norm in politics, but in this case it’s no exaggeration to say that the next four years could turn out to be the toughest that the Second Amendment has ever faced. Second Amendment supporters retain a majority in the U.S. House and Senate, but President Obama can damage the right to keep and bear arms severely in ways the House and Senate can do little, if anything, to prevent.

First and foremost, Obama can nominate anti-gun justices to the Supreme Court and anti-gun judges to other federal courts. Of course, the Senate blocks judicial nominations only in unusual circumstances, as demonstrated by its approval of Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan during Obama’s first term. 

It will be bad enough if Obama has the opportunity to replace the high court’s two oldest anti-gun justices, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer, with like-minded people who will carry the same views forward for decades. It will be far worse if he is able to replace one or more of the five justices who protected the Second Amendment in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and McDonald v. Chicago (2010). Even a one-vote change would create an anti-gun majority that could reverse those two decisions, declare that the Second Amendment does not protect a fundamental, individual right, and authorize new bans on guns, ammunition and accessories under government “police powers.”

Second, just days after the election—and with the Obama administration’s strong support—the United Nations voted to renew talks in March on the arms trade treaty that stalled this summer.  The current draft of the treaty includes, among other things, provisions that would require registration of gun owners who buy imported firearms and require a “national control system to regulate the export of ammunition for conventional arms.” 

The treaty’s supporters have pretended that the only controls they seek are those that would prevent Third World guerrillas from waging civil wars with military weapons obtained on the international black market. But the Control Arms Campaign, a coalition of civilian disarmament groups such as Oxfam International and Amnesty International whose campaign for the treaty has kept it on the U.N.’s front burner, now openly insists that the final document must also apply to “sporting or hunting firearms.”

As John R. Bolton, who served as the United States’ ambassador to the U.N. under President George W. Bush, once explained, “Gun-control groups, frustrated by years of failing to impose harsh measures on American firearms owners, have pursued a covert strategy. … [T]he hidden agenda of the gun controllers is to craft treaty language that, while seemingly innocuous, has long-range implications for the use and ownership of guns here in America.” Even a treaty that’s not immediately ratified by the Senate can pose a threat, as it could be taken off the shelf for ratification years or decades in the future, or simply pointed to as an international “norm” that the U.S. must follow.

On the domestic front, President Obama said during his second campaign debate with Gov. Mitt Romney that he supports a new federal “assault weapons” ban. Since then, staff members for Sen. Dianne Feinstein, d-Calif., have met with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives to work on drafting the necessary legislation. According to published reports of the meeting, Feinstein seeks to reinstate the federal ban on magazines that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition, which was imposed along with the federal “assault weapons” ban of 1994-2004. However, her new gun ban proposal is said to be significantly worse than the 1994 ban in two important respects. 

First, while the 1994 ban allowed rifles like the ar-15 to be manufactured with pistol grips (as long as they didn’t have flash suppressors, bayonet attachments, or adjustable-length stocks) the new ban would prohibit pistol grips altogether, essentially banning the rifles entirely or requiring a radical redesign. The same criteria would also ban the detachable-magazine m1 carbine and perhaps also the fixed-magazine m1 Garand rifle. Such a ban would be the death knell for the most popular rifle marksmanship competitions in our country, and would prevent millions of Americans from acquiring the most popular home-defense rifles currently available.

Second, while Feinstein apparently isn’t calling for abolition of the right of inheritance altogether, as radicals on the political left have urged for centuries, her gun ban reportedly would prohibit passing on any banned firearms and magazines to your heirs, let alone selling them while you’re still alive.

In the debate with Gov. Romney, Obama also opened the door to restrictions on “cheap handguns,” the firearms that gun control supporters have always most loathed, but which were expressly brought under the Second Amendment’s protection by the Supreme Court’s decision in Heller. Needless to say, given Obama’s statement and his longstanding opposition to private individuals carrying handguns for self-defense, his reelection will give us a much tougher fight for federal legislation establishing national recognition of state-issued Right-to-Carry permits.

Despite our best efforts, we were not able to deny Barack Obama and Joe Biden another four years in the White House.  However, as Alexis de Tocqueville observed, “The greatness of America lies . . . in her ability to repair her faults.” This year, five states—Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Jersey and Virginia—will hold elections for statewide offices. Next year, 20 Democratic and 13 Republican U.S. senators, and all 435 members of the House of Representatives, will be up for re-election. Record turnouts among voters who care about the Second Amendment can solidify our position at the state level and in the House and Senate. A stronger Senate majority, in particular, could block Obama’s most anti-gun nominees to the federal courts and reject any U.N. treaty that threatens the individual right to arms. Most important, record turnout could set the stage for the election of a pro-Second Amendment president in 2016.

 

Your NRA did everything in its power to protect our rights in 2012, and will continue to do so in the years to come. Political victories as important as the one we were denied in November will come when all Americans who care about the future of our country exercise their right to vote. 

Chris W. Cox

BY Chris W. Cox

NRA-ILA Executive Director

Follow This Contributor

Chris W. Cox has served as the executive director of the Institute for Legislative Action, the political and lobbying arm of NRA, since 2002. As NRA’s principal political strategist, Cox oversees eight NRA-ILA divisions: Federal Affairs; State & Local Affairs; Public Affairs; Grassroots; Finance; Research & Information; Conservation, Wildlife & Natural Resources; and Office of Legislative Counsel. Cox also serves as chairman of NRA’s Political Victory Fund (NRA-PVF), the Association’s political action committee; president of the NRA Freedom Action Foundation (NRA-FAF), which focuses on non-partisan voter registration and citizen education; and chairman of NRA Country, an effort to bring country music artists together with NRA members in support of our Second Amendment freedoms and hunting heritage.

TRENDING NOW
“Death by a Thousand Cuts” – Latest Ninth Circuit decision proclaims “selling firearms is not part or parcel of the right to keep and bear arms”

Second Amendment  

Friday, October 13, 2017

“Death by a Thousand Cuts” – Latest Ninth Circuit decision proclaims “selling firearms is not part or parcel of the right to keep and bear arms”

Since the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its landmark rulings in District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. Chicago, lower courts across the country have expressed their disagreement with – or downright hostility to ...

Alleged Sexual Predator and Hollywood Mogul Harvey Weinstein Threatens NRA (Again)

News  

Friday, October 13, 2017

Alleged Sexual Predator and Hollywood Mogul Harvey Weinstein Threatens NRA (Again)

On October 5, the New York Times published an article titled, “Harvey Weinstein Paid Off Sexual Harassment Accusers for Decades.” The piece detailed allegations that the mogul used his position of influence to make unwanted ...

Gun Banners Unmasked: The Vengeful Face of the Anti-gun Agenda Emerges Once Again

News  

Second Amendment  

Friday, October 13, 2017

Gun Banners Unmasked: The Vengeful Face of the Anti-gun Agenda Emerges Once Again

What happens to the 400 million or so firearms already in private hands? How does society actually benefit from his plan? Stephens doesn’t say. He apparently just trusts that things would eventually work themselves out ...

California: Governor Brown Signs Remaining Anti-Gun Bill

Sunday, October 15, 2017

California: Governor Brown Signs Remaining Anti-Gun Bill

Yesterday, Governor Brown signed Assembly Bill 424, the remaining anti-gun bill on his desk. 

Shall-Issue Concealed Carry Coming Soon to the Nation’s Capital!

News  

Second Amendment  

Friday, October 13, 2017

Shall-Issue Concealed Carry Coming Soon to the Nation’s Capital!

It’s important to celebrate that law-abiding Americans are now closer than they have been in nearly half a century to being able to exercise their firearms freedom in our nation’s capital. That is real progress.

California: Governor Vetoes Dealer Storage Bill and Signs Open Carry Ban

Saturday, October 14, 2017

California: Governor Vetoes Dealer Storage Bill and Signs Open Carry Ban

Yesterday, Governor Brown took action on two of the remaining three anti-gun bills by vetoing Senate Bill 464 and signing Assembly Bill 7. 

Media Consumers Beware: Watchdogs Warn of Bias, Politics, and Influence Tainting the “News”

News  

Friday, October 13, 2017

Media Consumers Beware: Watchdogs Warn of Bias, Politics, and Influence Tainting the “News”

Project Veritas’s “American Pravda” series has focused on the media itself, with prior releases including segments on CNN producers and personalities casting doubt on the network’s own narrative about Russian influence in the U.S. presidential ...

Spokane Police To Use Suppressors To Protect Hearing

News  

Monday, October 16, 2017

Spokane Police To Use Suppressors To Protect Hearing

The Spokane PD has 181 service rifles in its inventory; using suppressors on them has the potential to reduce workers compensation claims and lawsuits from bystanders.

California: San Jose City Council to Consider Mandatory Locked Storage Ordinance

Monday, October 16, 2017

California: San Jose City Council to Consider Mandatory Locked Storage Ordinance

On Tuesday, October 17, the San Jose City Council will be discussing a proposed firearms ordinance that will require any person who possesses a firearm in their residence to store the firearm in a locked ...

Massachusetts: Gun Control Bill on the Move

Wednesday, October 11, 2017

Massachusetts: Gun Control Bill on the Move

Today, without considering the unintended effects of such poorly thought out legislation, the Massachusetts state House of Representatives passed Amendment 1 attached to House Bill 3951 with overreaching language that would ban modifications commonly made ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -
NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.