Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN Legal & Legislation

BATFE Will Take Step Towards National Gun Sales Registration; NRA Will Take BATFE to Court

Friday, July 15, 2011

On Monday, July 11, the Obama administration announced that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives will soon begin requiring firearm dealers in the southwestern border states to file “multiple sale” reports on detachable-magazine rifles larger than .22 caliber. Under the plan, each dealer will be required to report, to the BATFE, any sale of two or more such rifles to a single individual with a period of five business days.

The administration’s decision, supposedly aimed at the trafficking of U.S. firearms to Mexican drug cartels, follows findings by Congress that the BATFE, in "Operation Fast and Furious," knowingly allowed straw purchasers to buy five, 10 or 20 firearms in single transactions and transfer them to higher-level gun traffickers working for the cartels. Disapproving of the new sales reporting scheme, House Judiciary Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas) said “It is the height of hypocrisy for the Obama administration to restrict the gun rights of border state citizens, when the administration itself knowingly and intentionally allowed guns to be trafficked into Mexico.”

NRA-ILA Executive Director Chris W. Cox promised legal action to stop the BATFE from implementing the rifle sales reports requirement. “The Administration lacks the statutory authority to do this and the NRA will file suit as soon as ATF sends the first demand letters” to dealers, Cox said. The BATFE lacks the authority because Congress has specifically required similar reports only for handgun sales, and therefore implicitly rejected such a requirement for other guns.

The move has already sparked action by pro-gun federal lawmakers. The House Appropriations Committee voted on Wednesday to ban any use of appropriated funds for the scheme (please see related story above), and even before the administration announcement, Sens. Jon Tester (D-Mont.) and Richard Burr (R-N.C.) introduced S. 570 to prohibit the use of federal funds for long gun sales reporting.

Gun control activist groups have demanded the new reporting requirement for months. Michael Bloomberg’s Mayors Against Illegal Guns called for it as part of its August 2009 Blueprint for Federal Action on Illegal Guns. As recently as last week, MAIG ignored the fact that Fast and Furious knowingly allowed straw purchasers to fill up their cars with guns and drive away unimpeded, telling President Obama that the rifle reports would “help ATF and other law enforcement identify individuals who may be buying guns like AK-47s and AR-15s by the carload.”

Even if the sales report requirement survives a legal challenge, it is doubtful that it would satisfy gun control supporters’ desire for ever-increasing record-keeping on firearm purchases. Bloomberg said the requirement is “a logical step” and Arturo Sarukhan, Mexico’s ambassador to the U.S., called it “a step that should prevent straw purchasers and individuals from illegally purchasing weapons in the U.S.” Their comments echoed the Brady Campaign’s earlier characterization of the requirement as “a first step of what should be a comprehensive approach to prevent gun violence in Mexico, and in America.” (Emphases added.)

The subsequent steps that Bloomberg, Sarukhan and the Brady Campaign have in mind are easy to anticipate. First, since some firearm dealers in Utah, Nevada, Colorado, Oklahoma, Arkansas and Louisiana are closer to the Mexican city most plagued by cartel murders, Ciudad Juarez, than dealers in some parts of California, gun control supporters could call for the rifle sales reporting requirement to be expanded to dealers in more states and, ultimately, nationwide. They could demand that the reporting requirement be expanded to the purchase of any two firearms—rifle, handgun, or shotgun—in any combination. And as illegal buyers predictably change their behavior to avoid reporting, anti-gun groups would likely demand a reporting threshold longer than five days.

Second, since straw purchasers could avoid appearing in dealers’ sales reports by buying firearms from multiple dealers, gun control supporters could demand that the instant check system be used to track how often an individual buys guns, as Virginia does to enforce its so-called “one gun a month” law. (Of course, gun control supporters would not be satisfied with a 30-day purchase record retention requirement. In 2009, Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) introduced legislation, S. 2820, proposing that the FBI be authorized to retain records of approved firearm transactions for 180 days.)

Finally, gun control supporters have already called sales by non-dealers a “loophole” that should be "closed" by prohibiting ordinary private firearm sales. Legislation to that effect, H.R. 1781, has already been introduced in Congress by Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-N.Y.).

None of this would affect the ability of the cartels to obtain guns by theft, by pay-offs to corrupt Mexican police officers and military personnel, or by smuggling from Central America. But, of course, for gun control supporters that has never been the goal.

Editor’s Note:  In response to the BATFE plan to force the reporting of semi-automatic rifle sales by Federal Firearm Licensees (FFL’s) in Southwest border states including Arizona, California, New Mexico, and Texas, NRA-ILA is looking to gather as much information as possible about the BATFE demand letters.  If you are:

1)   a FFL; and

2)   received a letter from the BATFE requiring you to report multiple sales, or other dispositions, of two or more rifles, as described above, and;

3)   you have conducted such sales in the past and believe that the letter you received requires you to report them to the BATFE,

please contact NRA-ILA’s Office of Legislative Counsel.  The office may be reached by phone at (703) 267-1161, fax (703) 267-1164 or email at ILALegal@nrahq.org.  If you contact the office via fax or email, please be sure to provide your name, contact information, and, if possible, a copy of the letter you received. 

Please do not contact this office if you are not a FFL, have not received one of these demand letters, or do not conduct sales that would require such reporting.

TRENDING NOW
Virginia Police Chief Advocates Ban on All Guns at U.S. House “Assault Weapons” Hearing

News  

Friday, September 27, 2019

Virginia Police Chief Advocates Ban on All Guns at U.S. House “Assault Weapons” Hearing

On Sept. 25, the Democrat-led U.S. House Judiciary Committee held a 3 ½ hour “hearing” entitled “Protecting America From Assault Weapons.” That framing of the issue underscored the erroneous notion that Americans need protection from ...

Kentucky: Committee to Consider Firearm Seizures Without Due Process

Friday, November 15, 2019

Kentucky: Committee to Consider Firearm Seizures Without Due Process

On Friday, November 22nd, the Kentucky state Interim Joint Committee on Judiciary will consider so called “red-flag laws.” Though no legislation has been introduced, such laws usually allow for Second Amendment rights to be suspended ...

Bloomberg Bought Virginia Legislators Introduce Confiscatory Gun Ban

News  

Monday, November 25, 2019

Bloomberg Bought Virginia Legislators Introduce Confiscatory Gun Ban

Michael Bloomberg’s bought and paid for Virginia legislators have wasted no time introducing legislation that would make the Old Dominion’s gun laws worse than those of the billionaire’s home state of New York.

NRA-Supported Case Heard by Supreme Court

News  

Tuesday, December 3, 2019

NRA-Supported Case Heard by Supreme Court

The National Rifle Association’s Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA) says this week’s Supreme Court hearing on a New York City gun control law could ultimately strengthen the ability of law-abiding citizens to exercise their Second ...

Joe Biden Wants to Ban 9mm Pistols

News  

Monday, November 25, 2019

Joe Biden Wants to Ban 9mm Pistols

A week after he told voters that the Second Amendment doesn’t protect “a magazine with a hundred clips in it,” 2020 Democratic Presidential Candidate Joe Biden offered supporters more of his singular brand of anti-gun ...

It’s Never Enough: Gun Control Advocates Won’t Ever Be Satisfied With Marginal Changes to Our Gun Laws

News  

Tuesday, December 3, 2019

It’s Never Enough: Gun Control Advocates Won’t Ever Be Satisfied With Marginal Changes to Our Gun Laws

When seeking to pass whatever the anti-gun flavor of the month is when it comes to gun legislation, anti-gun advocates often claim to be seeking only “reasonable” solutions. They often claim that if just one ...

NRA Files Joint Legal Challenge Against Firearm Storage Initiative Petition

Wednesday, November 27, 2019

NRA Files Joint Legal Challenge Against Firearm Storage Initiative Petition

On Friday, the National Rifle Association announced the filing of a joint legal challenge with the Oregon Hunters Association to contest Oregon Initiative Petition 40, which seeks to impose sweeping restrictions on the storage of ...

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

Gun Laws  

Thursday, January 1, 2015

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

CAUTION: Federal and state firearms laws are subject to frequent change. This summary is not to be considered as legal advice or a restatement of law.

Sanders Burns the 2020 Democratic Primary Gun Control Agenda

News  

Monday, November 18, 2019

Sanders Burns the 2020 Democratic Primary Gun Control Agenda

As anti-gun as the 2020 Democratic presidential contenders have exposed themselves to be, much of the field still gives lip-service to the Second Amendment and the Constitution. Take for instance Joe Biden. The leading candidate’s campaign has said that ...

No Protection for the Law that Protects the Firearm Industry: Supreme Court Passes on PLCAA Case

News  

Monday, November 18, 2019

No Protection for the Law that Protects the Firearm Industry: Supreme Court Passes on PLCAA Case

A law designed to protect the firearm industry from frivolous litigation is now in jeopardy thanks to inaction by the U.S. Supreme Court, which earlier this month passed on a petition to review a case ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.