Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

S. 77: The Firearms Dealer Harassment Act

Wednesday, February 28, 2007

Senator Charles Schumer, (D-N.Y.) has introduced S. 77, the "Anti-Gun Trafficking Penalties Enhancement Act of 2007." A more appropriate title would be the "Firearms Dealer Harassment Act." S. 77 directly threatens federal firearms license holders (FFLs) and gun buyers in two important ways.

First, S.77 would require that currently confidential Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE) records on firearms traces be turned over--on demand--to any government entity, for any purpose. (Currently, information from firearms traces can only be used in bona fide criminal investigations by law enforcement agencies.) S. 77 would require that these records be made available to any government agency for any reason, or for no stated reason whatsoever, without any justification or respect for privacy.

NRA has fought for years to maintain the confidentiality of this data and not allow it to be abused by anti-gun politicians. S. 77 would reverse those victories. (For more information, see "The ‘Tiahrt Amendment’ on Firearms Traces: Protecting Gun Owners` Privacy and Law Enforcement Safety".)

Anti-gun activists and politicians have sought this confidential data for use in lawsuits against the firearms industry; its release would lead directly to increased levels of harassing lawsuits and more firearms dealers being forced out of business. Gun buyers would find fewer dealers, higher prices and a smaller selection of firearms.

As damaging as this provision would be to firearms dealers, another provision could do even more harm. S. 77 would unleash the federal government to harass FFL holders at will, for any reason, as often as it chooses.

S. 77 would remove the restriction on BATFE that allows it only one regulatory inspection of dealers per year, and instead grant unlimited authority to go after dealers without need to show cause. This change is completely unnecessary, since BATFE already has significant legal methods for regulating dealers and enforcing firearm transfer laws:

  • Currently, BATFE can conduct FFL inspections once a year, without a warrant, to ensure all dealers operate in compliance with the law.
  • BATFE can conduct an inspection of a dealer without a warrant as a part of an ongoing criminal investigation.
  • BATFE can, of course, get a warrant when it suspects a dealer of criminal activities.

The law requires FFL holders to cooperate with all types of inspections. However, BATFE is prohibited from conducting inspections outside these limits to eliminate the type of harassment that was common before passage of the Firearm Owners’ Protection Act in 1986. S. 77 would turn back the clock on this vital reform, with devastating consequences for gun dealers and gun owners’ rights.

Finally--and perhaps most ominously--S. 77 would define certain already-illegal firearm transactions as "racketeering activity" under the "Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act" (RICO). Certainly, no one condones illegal sales (such as transfers to prohibited persons) but including them in RICO is overkill:

  • Under RICO, if a person commits two or more acts of "racketeering activity" within ten years, that "pattern of racketeering activity" can subject the violator to a 20-year prison term (in addition to the current sentences for the actual firearm violations) and seizure of assets.
  • Current sentences for this type of violation begin at five years in prison and a $250,000 fine per gun--so a person with a "pattern" of violations would already be subject to at least a decade in federal prison and a half-million dollar fine.

Even more disturbing, anyone "injured" by a "pattern of racketeering activity" can bring a civil suit against the violator; a successful plaintiff "shall recover threefold the damages he sustains and the cost of the suit." Of course, a crime victim couldn’t be "injured" by the illegal transfer itself--only by a later criminal use of the gun--so S. 77 would open a whole new path for anti-gun politicians and activists to sue gun owners and dealers for the actions of criminals.

IN THIS ARTICLE
Other
TRENDING NOW
A New Candidate for Confiscator-in-Chief

News  

Monday, November 11, 2019

A New Candidate for Confiscator-in-Chief

Former Texas Congressman Robert Francis O’Rourke abandoned his run for President last week, once again leaving a void for the most strident anti-gun candidate seeking the Democrat nomination. Even before declaring his candidacy for President, ...

New Hampshire: Firearm Seizure Bill Headed to House Floor

Thursday, October 31, 2019

New Hampshire: Firearm Seizure Bill Headed to House Floor

On October 30th, the New Hampshire state Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee sent House Bill 687 to the House floor for further consideration after a motion to kill the bill failed by a vote ...

Strong Firearms Preemption Laws are More Important Than Ever

News  

Gun Laws  

Monday, November 11, 2019

Strong Firearms Preemption Laws are More Important Than Ever

Photo Courtesy of Jeremy Tremp In recent weeks, gun owners have been given two prime examples of just how important strong firearms preemption laws are to the vibrant exercise of Second Amendment rights. On October ...

Wisconsin: Gov. Evers Calls for Firearm Confiscation & Criminalizing Private Transfers

Friday, September 20, 2019

Wisconsin: Gov. Evers Calls for Firearm Confiscation & Criminalizing Private Transfers

On September 19th, Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers, Attorney General Josh Kaul, Representative Melissa Sargent (D-48), and Senator Lena Taylor (D-4) held a press conference calling on the Legislature to violate the Second Amendment by: 1) ...

National Hearing Conservation Association Supports Suppressors

News  

Monday, November 4, 2019

National Hearing Conservation Association Supports Suppressors

Photo Courtesy of Silencer Shop On October 28th, the National Hearing Conservation Association sent its new position paper on firearms suppressors to the American Suppressor Association. The paper, in short, recognizes the important role that ...

Bloomberg’s Gun Control Apparatus Lies to Virginia’s Firearm Owners in Election Mailing

News  

Monday, November 4, 2019

Bloomberg’s Gun Control Apparatus Lies to Virginia’s Firearm Owners in Election Mailing

Here’s a hint for Virginia gun owners and sportsmen: When you get a firearm-related election mailing with a New York City return address and proudly proclaiming that it’s printed on soy ink, you can safely ...

NRA Statement on 2019 Election  Results

News  

Wednesday, November 6, 2019

NRA Statement on 2019 Election Results

The National Rifle Association released the following statement on the 2019 election results: "As if Gov. Northam’s legacy of ineptitude wasn’t enough, Virginians are about to experience life under a distant tycoon’s thumb."

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

Gun Laws  

Thursday, January 1, 2015

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

CAUTION: Federal and state firearms laws are subject to frequent change. This summary is not to be considered as legal advice or a restatement of law.

NRA Member spotlight: Meet the Man Who Helped Turn an Anti-Gun Townhall into a Pro-gun Rally

News  

Monday, October 28, 2019

NRA Member spotlight: Meet the Man Who Helped Turn an Anti-Gun Townhall into a Pro-gun Rally

At a townhall meeting in Michigan this month, Congresswoman Haley Stevens appeared to lose control when the NRA came up and began emotionally screaming, “The NRA has got to go! The NRA has got to go!” ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.