“When a federal appeals court ruled that the District of Columbia`s gun ban violates the right to `keep and bear arms,`” writes Jacob Sullum, “The New York Times reported that the judges were "interpreting the Second Amendment broadly." If they had interpreted the amendment in the normal, mainstream way, according to the Times, they would have concluded it imposes no restrictions on gun control because it has nothing to do with individual rights."
Read Original at: Washington Times