Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Newly Discovered Data Proves Why We Can’t Trust the CDC on Guns

Friday, June 8, 2018

Few who read this magazine are likely to be unaware of the anti-gun leanings of the Center for Disease Control, which for years has worked to treat firearm ownership like a disease that needs to be eradicated. But, newly discovered polling by the CDC shows just how far the agency is willing to go to hide evidence of the positive aspects of gun ownership.

To fully explain the recent discovery, a look at the history of Defensive Gun Use research is necessary:

The year is 1996. The Right to Carry movement is building momentum across the United States after violent crime peaked in the early 1990s. Criminologists Gary Kleck and Marc Gertz just published a study estimating that 2.5 million Americans used a firearm to defend themselves against another person in 1993. Gun-control advocates scoff at the number, though Kleck refutes the criticisms levied at his work (and does so even today).

The surest way to confirm, cast doubt upon, or refute any research is replication. The CDC had recently entered the “gun violence research” field, publishing a flawed study clearly designed to advocate for gun control in 1993.

Shortly after Kleck and Gertz published their research, the CDC began collecting data that could have been part of the debate over the hot-button issue of how often lawful gun owners use their guns in self-defense. They collected data on defensive gun use for three years (in 1996, 1997, and 1998) in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) surveys. This data collection was not discovered until Kleck just recently came across it while looking for data on another topic. While Kleck is currently analyzing the data and comparing it to his own, something is clearly amiss.

For 20 years, this data went unnoticed. Like some buried treasure, Kleck luckily discovered it essentially by accident. He wasn’t looking for it because, like the rest of the world outside of the CDC offices, he had no idea it existed. It was not discovered until 20 years after the CDC stopped collecting data on the topic. Twenty years of silence. Given how often questions about defensive gun usage come up and the wide range of estimates (from around 116,000 per year to millions, depending on the source) as well as the CDC’s clear interest on the topic, one may wonder why this data was never acknowledged.

Twenty years of silence is good reason to question the CDC’s motives. They had opportunities to publicize the data. Former President Obama directed the CDC to conduct research into the causes and prevention of gun violence in 2013. The CDC then requested the Institute of Medicine and the National Research Council identify the most pressing research problems. This report briefly discusses estimates of defensive gun usage, including citations of Kleck’s work, but makes no mention of the BRFSS data. The report notes the wide range of estimates, from “only” 108,000 annually to more than 3 million per year yet offers no mention of the CDC’s own data on the topic. Tellingly, every brief mention of defensive gun usage is followed by reference to the biased study on “risk factors associated with gun possession.”

Perhaps it was simply forgotten…by however many people worked on the BRFSS over the span of three years writing the survey, collecting the data, formatting the data, analyzing the data, and presumably presenting it to someone at CDC. Maybe it was misplaced.

Or maybe the CDC didn’t report the data because it did not corroborate their anti-gun leanings. It would be hard to advocate banning firearms from the same office that found a sizable number of law-abiding Americans use firearms to defend themselves every year. Is that more or less likely than a team of researchers forgetting they collected data on a hot-button topic?

Our assumptions about the CDC may be colored by their history with gun control advocacy. The motives or circumstances driving their silence may never be uncovered. Maybe in 20 years or so someone will find a long-lost memo that details why the CDC kept quiet. Maybe not.

While this data would have been useful to support our fight against gun control measures over the last twenty years, even now it can still serve as an example of how often law-abiding gun owners use firearms to defend themselves and others. Those who seek to curtail our firearms freedoms with anti-gun research always exclude the positive impacts of firearm ownership, but thanks to the CDC, we now know about the millions of Americans who are alive and unharmed today thanks to exercising their constitutional right to self-defense.

From the Director Articles
FROM
WITHIN

News  

Thursday, February 19, 2009

Moving Targets

Every shooter and hunter knows that moving targets are the hardest to hit. Whether it's a flushing pheasant ...

News  

Monday, January 26, 2009

Political Report: Same Anti-Gunners, Different Year

One of the most stinging blows that Hillary Clinton delivered to Barack Obama's presidential campaign came when she ...

News  

Monday, July 28, 2008

America's Worst Gun Laws: Coming Soon to a State Near You

As you go to the polls in November, remember some of the laws anti-gun politicians think are "reasonable."

News  

Friday, June 27, 2008

Political Report: NRA-ILA Wins Court Victories On Two Coasts

The Supreme Court has handed down its landmark decision in the Heller case, but we must also remember ...

News  

Monday, June 23, 2008

Political Report: Right-to-Carry In Our National Parks

On April 30, the U.S. Department of Interior, through the National Park Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife ...

News  

Thursday, May 29, 2008

Awaiting a Second Amendment Decision

The year 2008 will go down as an historic one in America--for the dramatic choices we`ll face in ...

News  

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

No Bullets, No Shooting!

All gun owners are familiar with the 17th century maxim, "Keep your powder dry." But if we expect ...

News  

Thursday, March 13, 2008

Time to Stop BATFE Abuses: Congress Pursues Firearm Law Reforms

Since we last reported on our drive to reform federal firearm laws ("BATFE Hearings Lead to Reform Bills," ...

News  

Wednesday, February 20, 2008

Your Vote is Your Voice: Make it Heard!

With the rise of early and absentee voting, Election Day is no longer a single day, but rather ...

News  

Friday, February 8, 2008

The Ten Facts You Need to Know About <I>Heller.</I>

On November 20, the Supreme Court agreed to hear one of the most important Second Amendment cases in ...

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.