Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

Trump’s Federal Court Appointments Will Help to Preserve Our Rights for a Generation

Wednesday, January 31, 2018

Trump’s Federal Court Appointments Will Help to Preserve Our Rights for a Generation

Government doesn’t always move quite as fast as we’d like. In recent years, members of both major political parties have complained about historic Congressional inaction. The requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act can slow down executive branch efforts to repeal or amend regulations. While it can be frustrating when our friends are in power, the more deliberative aspects of our system of government are an important check that preserves our rights when circumstances are less advantageous.

However, an important avenue where President Donald Trump and our friends in the Senate have been able to move swiftly to push a pro-gun rights agenda is by exercising the president’s constitutional authority to appoint federal judges. Once confirmed, federal judges serve for life “during good Behaviour.” 

On May 18, 2016, candidate Trump signaled to the American voter that he understood the importance of the federal judiciary when he broke with convention and released a list of potential U.S. Supreme Court nominees. Exit polling data from 2016 observed that Trump’s emphasis on sound judicial appointments was a crucial factor in his victory. An NBC News poll showed that 27 percent of Trump voters cited Supreme Court appointments as their most important factor in voting, while only 19 percent of Clinton voters answered likewise. Moreover, 22 percent of all voters listed Supreme Court appointments as their most important factor in voting, up from seven percent in 2008.

When Trump took office he inherited 114 federal court vacancies from Barack Obama. In contrast, there were only 54 vacancies when Obama was inaugurated and 81 when George W. Bush began his presidency. Through November, nine of Trump’s U.S. Courts of Appeals nominees had been confirmed. Obama only notched three in his first year in office. In early November, before Trump secured the ninth confirmation, the New York Times lamented that the first eight was “the most this early in a presidency since Richard M. Nixon.” 

Even with Trump’s early victories, as of mid-December, the number of vacancies had swelled to 144. This number included 119 positions on the U.S. District Courts and 17 on the U.S. Courts of Appeals. Eager to fill these seats, as of press time Trump had nominated 44 individuals to serve; 34 to the district courts and 7 to the appellate bench. 

When Trump took office he inherited 114 federal court vacancies from Barack Obama. In contrast, there were only 54 vacancies when Obama was inaugurated and 81 when George W. Bush began his presidency.

Trump has stated that he plans to make the most of his historic opportunity. During an October 17 news conference with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, the president explained, “many [nominees] are in the pipeline,” adding, “we will set records in terms of the number of judges.”

Moreover, Trump has shown that he is dedicated to nominating individuals with a proper understanding of our Second Amendment. This began with Trump’s nomination of Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch, who, less than three months after taking the bench, signed a blistering dissent of the Court’s decision not to take up a challenge to California’s may-issue carry regime. Trump has shown similar care in lower court appointments.

This fact has not gone unnoticed by gun rights opponents. Upon discovering that one of Trump’s district court nominees had written a 2013 blog post in support of NRA and the Second Amendment, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) took the nominee to task for his pro-gun views. In her written questions for the nominee, Feinstein all but demanded that the nominee pledge to recuse himself from “cases involving the NRA or where the NRA had taken a position.” Feinstein also quizzed the nominee on why he became a member of NRA.

Gun control proponents aren’t wrong to be concerned about a pro-Second Amendment shift in the federal judiciary. Following the landmark District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. Chicago Supreme Court decisions, the lower federal courts have played a significant role in interpreting the scope of the Second Amendment. Until the Supreme Court abandons its current reluctance take up Second Amendment cases, appellate court rulings on issues such as Right-to-Carry and commonly owned semiautomatic firearms will continue to be the law in their various districts.

Beyond strictly Second Amendment issues, federal judges are also asked to rule on the administrative state’s interpretation and enforcement of federal statute. Judges with a more comprehensive understanding of our rights should be more apt to remedy executive branch overreaches of the kind perpetrated by Obama and former-Attorney General Eric Holder.

At any given moment, NRA is involved in numerous federal court cases that run the gamut of issues that affect gun owners, from defending the Right-to-Carry, to protecting gun owners’ due process rights and privacy, to fighting illegitimate restrictions on the use of traditional ammunition. It’s impossible to know all of the federal litigation tomorrow will bring, but by prioritizing filling federal court vacancies, Trump and our Senate friends are helping to put gun rights supporters in a position to succeed for decades to come.

Chris W. Cox

BY Chris W. Cox

NRA-ILA Executive Director

Follow This Contributor

Chris W. Cox has served as the executive director of the Institute for Legislative Action, the political and lobbying arm of NRA, since 2002. As NRA’s principal political strategist, Cox oversees eight NRA-ILA divisions: Federal Affairs; State & Local Affairs; Public Affairs; Grassroots; Finance; Research & Information; Conservation, Wildlife & Natural Resources; and Office of Legislative Counsel. Cox also serves as chairman of NRA’s Political Victory Fund (NRA-PVF), the Association’s political action committee; president of the NRA Freedom Action Foundation (NRA-FAF), which focuses on non-partisan voter registration and citizen education; and chairman of NRA Country, an effort to bring country music artists together with NRA members in support of our Second Amendment freedoms and hunting heritage.

From the Director Articles


Tuesday, September 4, 2007

Political Report: An Assault on Hunting Equals an Attack on the Second Amendment

It's no coincidence that the politicians who oppose our Second Amendment freedoms also tend to oppose hunting. Direct, ...


Saturday, August 4, 2007

Political Report: Congress and The Tiahrt Amendment

It's taken six months, but Congress is finally turning its attention to the Second Amendment debate. By the ...


Wednesday, July 4, 2007

Political Report: AHSA and the Tiarht Amendment

Led by gun-ban lobbyist Robert Ricker and high-dollar underwriter of gun control groups and politicians Ray Schoenke, AHSA ...


Wednesday, May 23, 2007

Political Report: The Tiahrt Amendment

Ronald Reagan put it this way four decades ago: "The only choice we have is up or down--up, ...


Monday, April 16, 2007

Who Needs Another Alternative To NRA

Hot on the heels of the American Hunters and Shooters Association comes yet another group that promises to ...


Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Landmark Decision

An historic decision by a federal appeals court says the Second Amendment protects an individual right, and it ...


Thursday, March 1, 2007

State of the States

The new frontiers in the battle to protect our rights are being carved out in the 50 state ...


Thursday, February 1, 2007

Political Report: A New Majority in Congress

We built an extensive record of accomplishments between 2000 and 2006, and now the enemies of freedom are ...


Monday, January 1, 2007

Political Report: AHSA and Anti-Gun Groups

AHSA's deep relationship with the major gun-ban groups has already been thoroughly documented. AHSA's role as an anti-gun ...


Wednesday, November 15, 2006

Election Day 2006

On Election Day 2006, voters took out both frustration and anger on the Republican Party and turned over ...


Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.