NRA Explore

Ammunition

Since the 1960s, gun control supporters have tried to get one or another variety of ammunition banned, severely restricted, prohibitively taxed or excessively regulated, to discourage the acquisition of guns and undermine their use.

For example, though the Gun Control Act of 1968 preamble stated that the law was not intended “to place any undue or unnecessary Federal restrictions or burdens on law-abiding citizens with respect to the acquisition, possession, or use of firearms,” the law required purchasers of handgun-caliber ammunition and rifle-caliber ammunition that could be used in a handgun to sign ledgers documenting their purchases. Because the requirement resulted in a massive amount of paperwork that served no law enforcement purpose, Congress in 1982 rescinded it as it applied to .22 rimfire ammunition and in 1986, as part of the Firearms Owners Protection Act, rescinded it as it applied to center-fire ammunition.

In the 1980s, gun control supporters claimed they wanted to restrict new handgun bullets made of metals harder than lead, which had been invented to enable law enforcement officers shoot through walls and doors, but they instead pushed legislation that would have banned traditional ammunition manufactured with bullets made of lead, commonly used for self-defense, hunting and sports. The Departments of Justice and the Treasury, and the NRA, opposed the legislation and the NRA helped write the “armor piercing ammunition” law that Congress instead adopted in 1986.

In the 1990s, gun control supporters again proposed banning traditional ammunition, a move rejected by the Treasury Department. Separately, they also sought a 1,000 percent tax on 9mm, .25, and .32 caliber ammunition, a 50 percent tax on all handgun ammunition, a ban on mail-order ammunition sales, a requirement for a background check to purchase ammunition, and a limit on the amount of ammunition a person could own without an “arsenal license.” 

In February 2015, two years after failing to get Congress to ban the AR-15 and other general-purpose rifles, the Obama administration attempted to bypass Congress to ban the second most common ammunition used in the rifle. It withdrew the proposed ammunition ban after a majority in each house of Congress and over 80,000 Americans opposed the ban in letters and emails to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, and Congress threatened to reduce the chronically problematic agency’s budget.

Gun control supporters quickly took advantage of the situation to again call for a ban on traditional ammunition, like the bans that Congress rejected in 1986, and the Treasury Department rejected in 1997. Meanwhile, gun control supporters are trying to get traditional ammunition banned on environmental grounds as well.

 

issues top stories
Issue Articles
SECTION
FROM
WITHIN

Los Angeles Times  

Tuesday, September 27, 2016

'You live in some fantasy land': Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom receives flood of criticism on gun and marijuana initiatives

Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom on Monday received a flood of critical remarks from gun owners and others when ...

Sacramento Bee  

Monday, September 26, 2016

California: Police chiefs oppose Proposition 63

The California Police Chiefs Association will announce its opposition today to Proposition 63, a ballot measure championed by ...

Nevada: Please Attend NDOW’s Meeting Tomorrow to Voice Your Opposition to the Proposed Hunting Caliber Size Restrictions!

Hunting  

Friday, September 23, 2016

Nevada: Please Attend NDOW’s Meeting Tomorrow to Voice Your Opposition to the Proposed Hunting Caliber Size Restrictions!

As a reminder, tomorrow is the Nevada Board of Wildlife Commissioners’ meeting to discuss the proposed hunting caliber ...

Bakersfield Californian  

Thursday, September 22, 2016

California: Prop. 63 piles on redundant gun controls

There is such a thing as “piling on.” You see this often when public outrage collides with politicians ...

Agence France-Presse  

Wednesday, September 21, 2016

Gun-toting Democrats bristle at firearms limits in California

California is a Democratic bastion in the United States, but the party's presidential nominee Hillary Clinton has some ...

CALmatters  

Tuesday, September 20, 2016

Three multimillionaires stake a claim on California ballot

One of California’s marquee tech moguls is dropping big money into two California ballot measures. Sean Parker, the ...

Modesto Bee  

Tuesday, September 13, 2016

California: Hundreds rally in Modesto in support of gun rights

Carrying signs with messages including “No more gun laws,” “We will not comply” and “The 2nd Amendment: America’s ...

San Jose Mercury  

Monday, September 12, 2016

California: San Jose gun laws, New proposals criticized

In a state already known for some of the nation’s strictest gun controls, some San Jose officials are ...

Nevada: Please Attend NDOW’s September Meeting to Voice Opposition to the Proposed Hunting Caliber Size Restrictions!

Wednesday, September 7, 2016

Nevada: Please Attend NDOW’s September Meeting to Voice Opposition to the Proposed Hunting Caliber Size Restrictions!

The Nevada Board of Wildlife Commissioners released their meeting notice for Saturday, September 24.  At this meeting the Board ...

Press Enterprise  

Tuesday, September 6, 2016

California: Why Stan Sniff, John McMahon and other sheriffs oppose gun control

Some of Southern California’s most vocal gun rights advocates wear badges.Riverside County Sheriff Stan Sniff and San Bernardino ...

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.