Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

 

THE TRUTH ABOUT SO-CALLED "UNIVERSAL" BACKGROUND CHECK LEGISLATION H.R. 8

As proposed, H.R. 8 would forbid a person from transferring a firearm to another person unless facilitated through a licensed firearms dealer.  Both parties to the transfer must appear jointly at a willing dealer, who must conduct a background check through the National Instant Criminal Background Check System and comply with all state and federal requirements as though he were selling or transferring a firearm out of his own inventory.  

While proponents of the bills often refer to it as a background check on sales of firearms, the true effect of H.R. 8 would be criminalizing otherwise lawful conduct with firearms. The overbroad nature of the proposed legislation would criminalize many transfers that take place as part of hunting, recreational shooting, and even self-defense.

CURRENT LAW

The law regarding sales and transfers of firearms generally follows the sales of most regulated products in the United States.  Commercial sales are heavily regulated, but incidental sales and transfers by persons not in the business of selling firearms are not subject to some of these regulations.

Current federal law requires that “dealers” of firearms hold a federal firearms license and that any person who acquires a firearm from a dealer passes a background check that includes an inquiry of the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (“NICS”).

In addition to the federal requirements on licensed dealers, current federal and state law prohibits anyone from knowingly transferring a firearm to a prohibited person or to a person who is a resident of another state.

ABOUT H.R. 8

 On March 1, two bills were introduced in Congress to impose so-called "universal" background checks. The bill, H.R. 8, is being misleadingly described as simply requiring background checks on all sales of firearms, but this is just a small part of what these overbroad pieces of legislation would do.

Traps for Law-Abiding Gun Owners

The bill would make it a crime, subject to certain exceptions, to simply hand a firearm to another person. Any time gun owners carry out this simple act, they would potentially be exposing themselves to criminal penalties. While the bill does create some exceptions, they are overly complicated and create many traps for unwary gun owners. Accidental violations of these complicated provisions are not excused under the proposed legislation.  

This legislation is not about public safety. H.R. 8 attacks law-abiding gun owners by placing further burdens on gun ownership and use. For the anti-gun groups and politicians intent on criminalizing the private transfer of firearms, this legislation is just another step in their effort to extinguish America’s vibrant and legitimate gun culture.

Expanded Background Checks Don’t Work

Proponents of so-called “universal” background checks claim that this legislation is the “most important” thing that can be done to stop dangerous people from obtaining firearms. This is a lie. There is no evidence that expanded background checks are useful for this purpose.

In 2019, a study by anti-gun researchers confirmed that expanded background checks in California did not reduce gun homicides or gun suicides.

This finding is consistent with a review of past studies on expanded background checks by the RAND Corporation that found that “evidence of the effect of private-seller background checks on firearm homicides is inconclusive.”

In 2013, the Department of Justice’s National Institute of Justice researched so-called “universal” background checks and determined that they would be not be effective without further harsh firearms restrictions and efforts to combat straw purchasing.

Criminals are not deterred by background checks. ATF has reported, “[t]he most frequent type of trafficking channel identified in ATF investigations is straw purchasing from federally licensed firearms dealers. Nearly 50 percent ... .” A Chicago-area inmate explained this reality to researchers from the University of Chicago in relation to Illinois’s stringent firearm licensing regime for a 2015 study, stating, “All they need is one person who got a gun card in the ‘hood’ and everybody got one.”

A 2016 Department of Justice survey of “state and federal prisoners who had possessed a firearm during the offense for which they were serving” found that the most common source of prisoner firearms was “Off the street/underground market.” This was defined as “Illegal sources of firearms that include markets for stolen goods, middlemen for stolen goods, criminals or criminal enterprises, or individuals or groups involved in sales of illegal drugs.” Less than one percent had obtained their firearm from a gun show. 

Private transfers would have to be processed by federal firearm licensees (FFL) who could charge high fees or refuse to participate altogether; even people who want to remove firearms from their homes could be hampered from doing so by this bill if they lacked access to a participating FFL.

The End of Many Firearm Transfers and the Beginning of a Firearm Registry

H.R. 8  states that participation by dealers in private party transfers would be voluntary. Because of the legal conflict and uncertainty, many dealers might refuse to run these checks. Those dealers that are willing, must agree to assume the risk and uncertainty and are likely to demand costly fees for the service.  The language states that the dealer may charge a reasonable fee, but it does not cap or otherwise limit the dealer's discretion in this regard.

Even transfers that do not result in a change of ownership would presumptively have to go through H.R. 8 formalities. Thus, dealers would potentially have multiple records of the same firearm changing hands again-and-again, essentially creating a paper trail of everybody who handled the firearm.  The record-keeping burdens on the dealer would be considerable, and the records generated could form the basis for a later registry not just of those who own firearms, but those who merely took possession of one, for any purpose or length of time.

As an advisor to the Obama administration wrote, the effectiveness of a universal background regime "depends on … requiring gun registration…;" this bill weakens protections against using NICS checks to create a registry and sets the stage for future firearm registration requirements.

 

 

Tell members of Congress to oppose "Universal" Background Check Legislation H.R. 8!

Members of the media, U.S. Congress, and anti-gun groups continue to mislead the public on so-called "Universal" Background Checks. Find out what they're claiming, and then find out the truth.

Related

Hunting  

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

California: Governor Jerry Brown Signs Three Anti-Gun Bills into Law

On Sunday, California gun owners and sportsmen were dealt another blow when Governor Jerry Brown signed into law ...

Hunting  

Thursday, October 6, 2011

Final Days for California Governor to Hear Your Veto Request on Four Anti-Gun Bills

The final day for Governor Jerry Brown to veto or sign into law four pending anti-guns bills is ...

Hunting  

Friday, September 30, 2011

California Governor Has Four Anti-Gun Bills to Consider and Time is Running out to Request His Veto

Four anti-guns bills that are detrimental to California’s law-abiding gun owners have been presented to Governor Jerry Brown ...

Hunting  

Friday, September 23, 2011

California: Four Anti-Gun Bills Now on Your Governor’s Desk

Three of the four anti-gun bills that passed the California legislature have been presented to Governor Jerry Brown. ...

Hunting  

Monday, September 12, 2011

Your Gun Rights Under Attack in Sacramento

The California Legislature finally adjourned on Friday but not before passing four anti-gun bills. Governor Jerry Brown now ...

Hunting  

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

Final Two Days of the 2011 California Legislative Session

There are only two days left in the 2011 California legislative session, and your calls and e-mails are ...

Hunting  

Monday, September 5, 2011

California: Final Week of the 2011 Legislative Session

The 2011 California legislative session will adjourn this Friday, and your calls and e-mails are needed now more ...

Hunting  

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

More Pressure Needed Opposing Anti-Gun Legislation in Sacramento

The California Senate and Assembly Appropriations Committees are scheduled to hear several anti-gun bills this Thursday, August 25. ...

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

U.S. House Committee Passes Amendment to Defund Illegal Obama Firearm Sales Reporting Requirement

Today, during consideration of the FY 2012 Commerce, Justice, Science Appropriations bill, pro-gun U.S. Rep. Denny Rehberg (R-Mont.) ...

Hunting  

Friday, July 1, 2011

California: Two Extreme Anti-Gun Bills to be Heard on July 5

Anti-gun extremist Senator Kevin De León is continuing his assault on our Second Amendment rights in Sacramento for ...

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.