Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN Legal & Legislation

Florida Urgent Alert! Burden of Proof Bill up in Senate Rules on Thursday, 2/9/2017

Monday, February 6, 2017

 

DATE: February 6, 2017
TO: USF & NRA Member and Friends
FROM: Marion P. Hammer
  USF Executive Director
  NRA Past President


The critical self-defense bill/burden of proof bill will be heard by the Senate Rules Committee on Thursday, February 9, 2017, between 10:00am-12:00 noon.

SB-128 Burden of Proof by Sen. Rob Bradley restores the presumption of innocence in self-defense cases by putting the burden of proof BACK ON THE STATE where it belongs. 

CONTRARY to what some of the media and antigun legislators have tried to claim,
this bill is NOT an expansion of the Stand Your Ground law. This bill only puts the burden of proof back on the state where it belongs and where it was before some antigun prosecutors and judges reversed it.

To nullify parts of the Castle Doctrine/Stand Your Ground law they didn't like, some antigun prosecutors/state attorneys and judges conspired to circumvent the law.

Through court action, prosecutors and judges reversed key provisions of the self-defense law.  They created a special "Stand Your Ground" court hearing that forces the person who acted in self-defense to prove innocence rather than the state prove guilt.  In other words, victims who defend themselves are now being treated like criminals.

Prosecutors apparently think it's all about them; what they want; what is convenient for them.  They are willing to put law-abiding citizens at a disadvantage to make their jobs easier.  Some prosecutors and State Attorneys have become more interested in convictions rather than justice. 

This bill stops that and puts the law back to the original intent of the Legislature and protections they put in law.

Watch this video of Senate President Joe Negron explaining why this bill is important. THEN follow the instructions below and contact Judiciary Committee members. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=opv_hIqcngs&feature=youtu.be

Please EMAIL the following Senate members IMMEDIATELY and URGE them to SUPPORT SB-128

IN THE SUBJECT LINE PUT:  SUPPORT SB-128 in Senate Rules Committee

(To send your message to all just Block and Copy All email addresses into the "Send To" box)

benacquisto.lizbeth@flsenate.gov,
book.lauren@flsenate.gov,
bradley.rob@flsenate.gov,
brandes.jeff@flsenate.gov,
braynon.oscar@flsenate.gov,
flores.anitere@flsenate.gov,
galvano.bill@flsenate.gov,
latvala.jack@flsenate.gov,
lee.tom@flsenate.gov,
montford.bill@flsenate.gov,
simpson.wilton@flsenate.gov,
thurston.perry@flsenate.gov

These Senate Committee members need to hear from you.  Please email them IMMEDIATELY.

BACKGROUND ON BURDEN OF PROOF:

In 2005, people who exercised self-defense were being prosecuted like criminals and courts – with no legislative authority – were imposing  a "duty to retreat" in self-defense cases. 

Courts were instructing juries to find victims guilty if the victim had not tried to run away before fighting back against a criminal attack.

So the Legislature took action to restore the constitutional right of self-defense and created a specific, statutory right of immunity for people who defend themselves from attack.

That law prohibits arresting, detaining in custody, charging and prosecuting unless and until an investigation reveals there is probable cause to believe the act was not lawful self-defense.

But some prosecutors and judges didn't like it so they found a way to usurp the law and bypass the intent of the Legislature. 

With no legislative authority, they created a special "Stand Your Ground" hearing and reversed the burden of proof from the state to the victim.   Through case law, they changed a legislative law they didn't like.

They effectively created the presumption of guilt for the exercise of self-defense.

After conspiring to create an extra hearing in self-defense cases, prosecutors are now arguing that it would be "too much work for them" if  the State has the burden of proof in this additional hearing and they actually have to prove their cases.

And in July, 2015, the majority of the Florida Supreme Court found that victims SHOULD have the burden of proof and prove they are "entitled to immunity provided by the Legislature."   It is an outrageous opinion.

Supreme Court Justice Charles Canady and Justice Ricky Poltson strongly objected and in dissenting opinion, Canady wrote that the majority opinion, "substantially curtails the benefit of the immunity from trial conferred by the Legislature under the Stand Your Ground law."

Further, he wrote that the majority "cannot justify curtailing the immunity ..." And that this problem is a matter for the Legislature to resolve. 

In other words it's up to the Legislature to put it back.  This bill fixes it.  It places the burden of proof back on the state where it belongs.  And it restores the right of the presumption of innocence and the right of self-defense.  

TRENDING NOW
Iowa DNR Falsely Claims Authority to Create List of Approved Hunting Cartridges

Tuesday, December 1, 2020

Iowa DNR Falsely Claims Authority to Create List of Approved Hunting Cartridges

On Tuesday, December 1st, the Iowa Department of Natural Resources circulated an email seeking input on proposed laws ahead of the 2021/22 deer season. The department falsely claims that recent legislation “directs the DNR to develop a list of ...

Pennsylvania: Gov. Wolf Vetoes Pair of Emergency Powers Bills

Friday, December 4, 2020

Pennsylvania: Gov. Wolf Vetoes Pair of Emergency Powers Bills

Last week, Gov. Tom Wolf vetoed a pair of  pro-Second Amendment bills that had passed both chambers of the Legislature with solid support. 

ATF Continues Rogue Assault on Common Pistols, Rule of Law

News  

Monday, November 2, 2020

ATF Continues Rogue Assault on Common Pistols, Rule of Law

Rogue elements of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) are continuing their assault on certain types of commonly-owned semi-automatic pistols. According to the law firm Wiley, ATF has developed a new interpretation of ...

New Jersey LEOSA Lawsuit Will Proceed

Wednesday, December 2, 2020

New Jersey LEOSA Lawsuit Will Proceed

Earlier this year, a group of retired federal-law-enforcement officers sued the state of New Jersey for not honoring their right to carry under the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act.

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

Gun Laws  

Thursday, January 1, 2015

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

CAUTION: Federal and state firearms laws are subject to frequent change. This summary is not to be considered as legal advice or a restatement of law.

Gun Grabbers Demand Unprecedented “Executive Actions”

News  

Monday, November 23, 2020

Gun Grabbers Demand Unprecedented “Executive Actions”

Biden was supposedly the point man for the gun control push Barack Obama launched during his second term. Obama has made a point of repeatedly emphasizing how lack of “progress” on gun control was the most frustrating and anger-inducing aspect ...

NRA Files Lawsuit Challenging New Jersey’s Restrictive Concealed Carry Laws

Tuesday, December 1, 2020

NRA Files Lawsuit Challenging New Jersey’s Restrictive Concealed Carry Laws

The National Rifle Association’s Institute for Legislative Action partnered with The Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs in a lawsuit against the state of New Jersey for infringing on our members’ right to ...

NRA Sues New Jersey Over Concealed Carry Law

News  

Tuesday, December 1, 2020

NRA Sues New Jersey Over Concealed Carry Law

The National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action and the Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs, which is NRA’s affiliate in New Jersey, filed a lawsuit today against the state of New Jersey for ...

BATFE Leadership Push Biden to Target Pistol Stabilizing Braces and Unfinished Receivers

News  

Monday, November 16, 2020

BATFE Leadership Push Biden to Target Pistol Stabilizing Braces and Unfinished Receivers

Just in case anyone needed further proof that much of the federal bureaucracy is more interested in serving themselves and left-wing political interests than public service, news broke this week that rogue elements of Bureau ...

Joe Biden and Kamala Harris Want to Destroy the Second Amendment

News  

Monday, November 2, 2020

Joe Biden and Kamala Harris Want to Destroy the Second Amendment

While discussion of the Second Amendment and gun control have been noticeably absent from the presidential debates and mainstream media coverage, gun rights are without a doubt on the ballot tomorrow.

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.