Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Bloomberg Operatives (Again) Mislead Public on "School Shootings"

Friday, December 19, 2014

 Bloomberg Operatives (Again) Mislead Public on "School Shootings"

It tells you a lot about gun control that those who promote it think that they can’t do so honestly and forthrightly.

Take Michael Bloomberg’s Everytown and “Moms Demand Action” anti-gun groups, as examples. Last week, almost two years to the day since the terrible crime at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, they released a “report” and a video advertisement designed to scare the American people into believing that crimes like the one in Newtown are commonplace.

The anti-gunners’ “report” claims that there have been 95 “school shootings” since the one in Newtown, while the video ad portrays schoolchildren being subjected to a school lockdown drill, as if to suggest that attacks like the one in Newtown are commonplace.

Happy to go along with the fraud are, as usual, elements of the news media that favor gun control. For example, USA Today reported the “95” claim as if prior such claims were uncontested. It failed to mention that several months ago, when the anti-gunners’ claimed that there had been 74 “school shootings” since the one in Newtown,  a number of groups attacked the count’s methodology, and the Tampa Bay Tribune FactChecker rated the claim “mostly false.”

The reason was, as former President Bill Clinton might have said, “It all depends on how you define ‘school shootings.’” What the Tribune discovered was that Bloomberg’s operatives had counted as a “school shooting” virtually any instance in which a gun was fired on or near the campus of any primary or secondary school or college or university, whatever the circumstances. Those compiling the count did not attempt to distinguish incidents based on whether the persons involved had anything to do with the schools, whether anyone was injured or killed, or whether the incident took place during school hours.

The anti-gunners had even included self-defense shootings as “school shootings,” one of many ethical lapses for which they were criticized on NationalReview.com by hard-hitting reporter Charles C. W. Cooke.

The anti-gunners had even included self-defense shootings as “school shootings,” one of many ethical lapses for which they were criticized on NationalReview.com by hard-hitting reporter Charles C. W. Cooke.  Everytown and “Moms Demand Action” at least omitted self-defense shootings from their new “95” list. Yet the list still seeks to exploit public horror of Newtown-like incidents and to exaggerate the prevalence of such exceedingly rare occurrences. Of the 95 incidents listed, 23 resulted in fatalities. Of these 23 incidents, eight were unrelated to the schools where the crimes took place or to school-sponsored events. For example, in one incident, a man killed family members he had arranged to meet in a school parking lot.

The remaining 15 fatal incidents encompassed 19 murders, two suicides, and one accidental death among students, teachers and other school employees. Perpetrators included gang members, students, school employees and other persons not associated with the schools. While every such incident is deplorable, the picture that emerges upon closer examination is a far cry from the anti-gunners’ suggestion that crimes of the type and scale of Newtown have been occurring on a regular basis during the last two years.

The anti-gunners’ repetitive “school shootings” mischaracterization is only one of many deceptions the groups use to try to generate support for so-called “universal” background checks.

Both of Bloomberg’s groups continue to claim that 40 percent of firearms are sold without a background check, more than a year after the Washington Post FactChecker gave President Obama “Three Pinocchios” for making the claim. The Post’s critique noted that the authors of the study upon which the claim is supposedly based say they “don’t know the current percentage -- nor does anyone else.”

Both of Bloomberg’s groups continue to claim that 40 percent of firearms are sold without a background check, more than a year after the Washington Post FactChecker gave President Obama “Three Pinocchios” for making the claim. The Post’s critique noted that the authors of the study upon which the claim is supposedly based say they “don’t know the current percentage -- nor does anyone else.”Both groups additionally claim that background checks stop criminals from getting guns, even though federal studies in 1991, 1997 and 2004 show that people imprisoned for gun crimes get guns mostly by theft, from the black market, or from acquaintances. Moreover, nearly half of illegally trafficked guns originate with straw purchasers. Background checks do not and cannot stop any of these things from happening.

Both groups further claim that people can buy guns “online,” without acknowledging that federal law prohibits transferring a firearm to a person known or reasonably suspected of being prohibited from possessing firearms, and prohibits transferring a firearm across state lines to a person who is not a federally licensed firearm dealer (FFL).

Perhaps the most blatant falsehood is the claim by both groups that a “loophole” exists in federal law where background checks are concerned. Nothing could be further from the truth. In passing and amending the Gun Control Act of 1968, as well as the Brady Act in 1993, which created the FFL/background check system in effect today, Congress deliberately distinguished between licensed retail sales and occasional, casual transfers between private parties.

In the Preamble to the 1968 Act, Congress stated “it is not the purpose of the title to place any undue restrictions or burdens on law-abiding citizens . . . or provide for the imposition by Federal regulations of any procedures or requirements other than those reasonably necessary to implement and effectuate the provisions of this title.”

The 1968 Act required a person to obtain an FFL if “engaged in the business” of selling firearms. In 1986, Congress clarified what “engaged in the business” meant. The 1986 language, still in effect, states that “engaged in the business means . . . a person who devotes time, attention, and labor to dealing in firearms as a regular course of trade or business with the principal objective of livelihood and profit through the repetitive purchase and resale of firearms ….” It goes on to state that “such term shall not include a person who makes occasional sales, exchanges, or purchases of firearms for the enhancement of a personal collection or for a hobby, or who sells all or part of his personal collection of firearms.”

In 1993, Congress imposed the Brady Act, requiring FFLs to conduct a background check when transferring a firearm to an unlicensed person. Congress, as it had done in 1968 and 1986, again clearly distinguished between FFLs and private gun owners, imposing the Brady Act’s background check requirement only on transfers conducted by FFLs. It did so not because of a loophole, but by design.  Furthermore, it was gun control supporters who wrote the Brady Act. If they had wanted Congress to impose the same requirements on transfers between private gun owners, as on those conducted by FFLs, they could have written their legislation accordingly and taken their chances on getting it approved.

Anti-gun activists have promised to make “universal” background checks their priority in 2015. However, as the anti-gunners’ fundamental dishonesty becomes more widely known, their chances of moving America toward national gun registration should decrease decisively.

TRENDING NOW
Court's Commonsense Conclusion: "There Was a Gun" Isn't Enough to Justify Issuing a Restraining Order

Second Amendment  

Friday, May 19, 2017

Court's Commonsense Conclusion: "There Was a Gun" Isn't Enough to Justify Issuing a Restraining Order

The Supreme Court of North Dakota confirmed this week that simply possessing a handgun while on one’s own private property cannot support a finding of "disorderly conduct" under the state’s disorderly conduct restraining order law. ...

Illinois: House Committee Passes Bill to Close Local Gun Dealers

Tuesday, May 16, 2017

Illinois: House Committee Passes Bill to Close Local Gun Dealers

The House Judiciary Committee passed Senate Bill 1657 by a 7-6 vote.

Rep. Rob Bishop Introduces the "Lawful Purpose and Self Defense Act"

News  

Friday, May 26, 2017

Rep. Rob Bishop Introduces the "Lawful Purpose and Self Defense Act"

On Wednesday, May 24, 2017, Chairman of the House Committee on Natural Resources Rob Bishop (R-UT) introduced H.R. 2620, the "Lawful Purpose and Self Defense Act." This bill would remove ATF's authority to use the ...

Nevada: Governor Sandoval Signs AB 118!

Monday, May 22, 2017

Nevada: Governor Sandoval Signs AB 118!

Today, May 22, Governor Brian Sandoval signed important pro-gun legislation, Assembly Bill 118, into law.  AB 118, sponsored by Assemblyman Skip Daly, will allow members of the military and those who have received an honorable ...

Abbott Signs Senate Bill 16, Bringing Texas License To Carry Fees Down to Among Lowest in Nation

News  

Thursday, May 25, 2017

Abbott Signs Senate Bill 16, Bringing Texas License To Carry Fees Down to Among Lowest in Nation

The National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA) today applauded Texas Gov. Greg Abbott for signing into law NRA-backed legislation that will make license to carry fees in Texas among the lowest in the ...

Concealed Carrying Hits New High, Underscores Need for National Law

News  

Friday, May 26, 2017

Concealed Carrying Hits New High, Underscores Need for National Law

Information collected by the Crime Prevention Research Center (CPRC) indicates an unprecedented surge in the number of concealed carry permits, with the largest one-year increase on record occurring between May 2016 and May 2017.

Legislation Reintroduced to Permanently Dismantle Obama-Era Enforcement Abuse

News  

Second Amendment  

Friday, May 26, 2017

Legislation Reintroduced to Permanently Dismantle Obama-Era Enforcement Abuse

This week, Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-MO) reintroduced the Financial Institution Customer Protection Act, a bill aimed at permanently dismantling Operation Choke Point (OCP).  

California: Don’t Miss our May 25th Webinar to Discuss the Newest DOJ Draft “Assault Weapons” Regulations

Wednesday, May 24, 2017

California: Don’t Miss our May 25th Webinar to Discuss the Newest DOJ Draft “Assault Weapons” Regulations

Tomorrow, Thursday, May 25, at 12:00 pm (PT), NRA’s legal team will be hosting a free webinar to discuss the recently submitted “assault weapon” regulations.   

Washington: NRA Files Amicus Brief in Challenge to Kitsap County Anti-Gun Ordinance

Monday, May 22, 2017

Washington: NRA Files Amicus Brief in Challenge to Kitsap County Anti-Gun Ordinance

Last week, attorneys on behalf of the NRA filed an amicus brief in Kitsap County v. Kitsap Rifle and Revolver Club (Kitsap II), the case which challenges Kitsap County’s firearm discharge ban and range licensing scheme.  Kitsap Rifle and ...

Illinois: Anti-Gun Legislators Attempting to Get “Assault Weapon” Language into law

Wednesday, May 24, 2017

Illinois: Anti-Gun Legislators Attempting to Get “Assault Weapon” Language into law

This week, Senator Antonio Munoz filed Senate Amendment 2 to Senate Bill 556.

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -
NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.