Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

August 2012 Standing Guard: "People's Rights Amendment" Threatens Free Speech

Tuesday, July 24, 2012

By Wayne LaPierre, NRA Executive Vice President

Remember when President Barack Obama, in his first State of the Union speech, had the gall to publicly attack the U.S. Supreme Court for upholding freedom of speech in its decision on Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission?

Now Obama’s allies on Capitol Hill want to deny the right to political free speech to you, me and groups like the NRA completely and forever—even if they have to amend the U.S. Constitution.

For months I’ve warned you of the grave consequences our freedoms will face if Obama, his administration and its Capitol Hill enablers are re-elected on Nov. 6. If you ever needed proof that they oppose your freedoms and endanger all of the rights you cherish as an American, here’s yet more evidence:

On Capitol Hill, U.S. Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass., joined by House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and dozens of other Democrats, has introduced House Joint Resolution 88, proposing a “People’s Rights Amendment” to the U.S. Constitution.

But the name “People’s Rights Amendment” is false advertising at its most frightening. It would effectively revoke your First Amendment right to freedom of speech when you exercise your freedom of association through organizations like the NRA.

Under the amendment, the rights enshrined in our Constitution would be guaranteed only to so-called “natural persons.” In other words, you’d have rights as an individual. But as soon as you associate with other individuals and pool resources to exercise your rights collectively—as you do through the NRA—you no longer would have those rights.

As the amendment’s text dictates, “People, person, or persons as used in this Constitution does not include corporations, limited liability companies or other corporate entities. ...” And as its author Rep. McGovern explained, “ ... all corporate entities—for-profit and non-profit alike—are not people with constitutional rights.”

Under the “People’s Rights Amendment,” anyone who tried to exercise his or her constitutional rights collectively with other people would be “subject to such regulation” as Congress deems “reasonable.”

If that sounds to you like a blank check for government censorship, that’s because it is.

In practical terms, the “People’s Rights Amendment” would shut groups like the NRA out of the political process by denying our right to freedom of speech. We wouldn’t be allowed to speak out on your behalf regarding legislation, elections or any other political issue.

You could stand on a street corner giving speeches or distributing leaflets, but if you pool efforts with like-minded people—your rights would cease to exist. You and I know that’s just the opposite of what our nation’s founders intended. As Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the Citizens United case, “The First Amendment protects more than just the individual on a soapbox and the lonely pamphleteer.”

Apparently, the politicians pushing this madness either don’t understand the danger or are willing to accept it for purely partisan political gain. What they ignore at their peril is that the “People’s Rights Amendment” could be used by government to censor or silence anyone—even those promoting the scheme. As they say, “What goes around comes around”—and everyone pays the price.

The New York Times, MSNBC and Time-Warner are all corporations. Would Obama and his allies try to silence them? Or only groups like the NRA that try to stop his anti-gun, anti-freedom agenda? Make no mistake: This is a sinister and profoundly dangerous proposal.

Before you dismiss it as some radical, leftist pipe dream that would never be adopted—or be overturned by the courts if it were—consider this:

At least four states—Hawaii, New Mexico, Vermont and Rhode Island—have already passed resolutions calling for this amendment. At this writing, Massachusetts is poised to become the fifth state to endorse it.

That’s why it is critical that you and everyone you know who cares about American freedom go “ALL IN” on Election Day, Nov. 6.

If we don’t stop them by defeating them at the polls, Obama and his freedom-hating allies could, with this dangerous constitutional amendment, destroy the vital checks and balances that keep Americans free and our democracy stable and strong.

As Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in the Citizens United decision, “Speech is an essential mechanism of democracy, for it is the means to hold officials accountable to the people. … The right of citizens to inquire, to hear, to speak, and to use information to reach consensus, is a precondition to enlightened self-government and a necessary means to protect it.”

IN THIS ARTICLE
Elections Election 2012
TRENDING NOW
Supreme Court Asked to Review Maryland's Gun Ban

News  

Friday, July 21, 2017

Supreme Court Asked to Review Maryland's Gun Ban

A group of Maryland citizens, with the support of the National Rifle Association, filed a petition to the United States Supreme Court on Friday seeking to reverse a Court of Appeals ruling that stripped some of America’s most ...

The Danger Of A “Not In My Backyard” Mentality On Shooting Ranges

News  

Wednesday, July 19, 2017

The Danger Of A “Not In My Backyard” Mentality On Shooting Ranges

Muscatine County, Iowa, is home to about 40,000 people, and like too many places around the country, gun owners there have no public range where they can practice or compete safely. That may be changing, ...

Former Bloomberg Lackey Comes Clean on True Anti-gun Agenda

News  

Second Amendment  

Friday, July 21, 2017

Former Bloomberg Lackey Comes Clean on True Anti-gun Agenda

Back when Mark Glaze was executive director of Michael Bloomberg’s Mayors Against Illegal Guns, and later Everytown for Gun Safety, he went to great lengths to portray his master’s anti-gun positions as moderate. Glaze used ...

Court to Texas College Professors: Your Irrational Fear of Gun Owners Is Not Legally Addressable

News  

Wednesday, July 12, 2017

Court to Texas College Professors: Your Irrational Fear of Gun Owners Is Not Legally Addressable

Last Thursday, a federal judge in Austin, Texas, dismissed a lawsuit by several professors who sought to block the University of Texas from implementing a state law that provides for the lawful carrying of concealed ...

The Need for National Reciprocity

News  

Friday, July 21, 2017

The Need for National Reciprocity

A report from the Crime Prevention Research Center estimates that the number of concealed carry permits issued last year was the largest increase ever – continuing a four year trend of record setting increases in ...

One More Reason Gun Owners Should Be Celebrated

News  

Second Amendment  

Thursday, July 20, 2017

One More Reason Gun Owners Should Be Celebrated

The safety record of America’s gun owners is nothing short of stunning. 

“She Persisted” – Gun Owner Fights Unlawful “No Return” Gun Policy

News  

Friday, July 21, 2017

“She Persisted” – Gun Owner Fights Unlawful “No Return” Gun Policy

On July 17, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit confirmed that law enforcement officials in New York acted unlawfully with respect to guns confiscated from a Nassau County woman in 2012.  

CMP Sales of 1911s One Step Closer With House Passage of 2018 NDAA

Friday, July 14, 2017

CMP Sales of 1911s One Step Closer With House Passage of 2018 NDAA

On Friday, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R. 2810, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2018. Included in the bill is a provision that would make U.S. Army surplus 1911 .45 ACP ...

California:  "Assault Weapon" Regulations Take 3: CA DOJ Resubmits Regulations

Friday, July 21, 2017

California: "Assault Weapon" Regulations Take 3: CA DOJ Resubmits Regulations

Today, July 21, the California Department of Justice (“DOJ”), without warning or any notification,  submitted another set of proposed regulations for the registration of newly classified “assault weapons” to the Office of Administrative Law.  As ...

When Gun Control Fails

News  

Second Amendment  

Friday, July 21, 2017

When Gun Control Fails

Gun control is pushed as a strategy to keep Americans safe in their homes, schools and workplaces. It is presented as the key component in safer streets, neighborhoods and families. But what happens when gun ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -
NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.