Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

August 2012 Standing Guard: "People's Rights Amendment" Threatens Free Speech

Tuesday, July 24, 2012

By Wayne LaPierre, NRA Executive Vice President

Remember when President Barack Obama, in his first State of the Union speech, had the gall to publicly attack the U.S. Supreme Court for upholding freedom of speech in its decision on Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission?

Now Obama’s allies on Capitol Hill want to deny the right to political free speech to you, me and groups like the NRA completely and forever—even if they have to amend the U.S. Constitution.

For months I’ve warned you of the grave consequences our freedoms will face if Obama, his administration and its Capitol Hill enablers are re-elected on Nov. 6. If you ever needed proof that they oppose your freedoms and endanger all of the rights you cherish as an American, here’s yet more evidence:

On Capitol Hill, U.S. Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass., joined by House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and dozens of other Democrats, has introduced House Joint Resolution 88, proposing a “People’s Rights Amendment” to the U.S. Constitution.

But the name “People’s Rights Amendment” is false advertising at its most frightening. It would effectively revoke your First Amendment right to freedom of speech when you exercise your freedom of association through organizations like the NRA.

Under the amendment, the rights enshrined in our Constitution would be guaranteed only to so-called “natural persons.” In other words, you’d have rights as an individual. But as soon as you associate with other individuals and pool resources to exercise your rights collectively—as you do through the NRA—you no longer would have those rights.

As the amendment’s text dictates, “People, person, or persons as used in this Constitution does not include corporations, limited liability companies or other corporate entities. ...” And as its author Rep. McGovern explained, “ ... all corporate entities—for-profit and non-profit alike—are not people with constitutional rights.”

Under the “People’s Rights Amendment,” anyone who tried to exercise his or her constitutional rights collectively with other people would be “subject to such regulation” as Congress deems “reasonable.”

If that sounds to you like a blank check for government censorship, that’s because it is.

In practical terms, the “People’s Rights Amendment” would shut groups like the NRA out of the political process by denying our right to freedom of speech. We wouldn’t be allowed to speak out on your behalf regarding legislation, elections or any other political issue.

You could stand on a street corner giving speeches or distributing leaflets, but if you pool efforts with like-minded people—your rights would cease to exist. You and I know that’s just the opposite of what our nation’s founders intended. As Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the Citizens United case, “The First Amendment protects more than just the individual on a soapbox and the lonely pamphleteer.”

Apparently, the politicians pushing this madness either don’t understand the danger or are willing to accept it for purely partisan political gain. What they ignore at their peril is that the “People’s Rights Amendment” could be used by government to censor or silence anyone—even those promoting the scheme. As they say, “What goes around comes around”—and everyone pays the price.

The New York Times, MSNBC and Time-Warner are all corporations. Would Obama and his allies try to silence them? Or only groups like the NRA that try to stop his anti-gun, anti-freedom agenda? Make no mistake: This is a sinister and profoundly dangerous proposal.

Before you dismiss it as some radical, leftist pipe dream that would never be adopted—or be overturned by the courts if it were—consider this:

At least four states—Hawaii, New Mexico, Vermont and Rhode Island—have already passed resolutions calling for this amendment. At this writing, Massachusetts is poised to become the fifth state to endorse it.

That’s why it is critical that you and everyone you know who cares about American freedom go “ALL IN” on Election Day, Nov. 6.

If we don’t stop them by defeating them at the polls, Obama and his freedom-hating allies could, with this dangerous constitutional amendment, destroy the vital checks and balances that keep Americans free and our democracy stable and strong.

As Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in the Citizens United decision, “Speech is an essential mechanism of democracy, for it is the means to hold officials accountable to the people. … The right of citizens to inquire, to hear, to speak, and to use information to reach consensus, is a precondition to enlightened self-government and a necessary means to protect it.”

IN THIS ARTICLE
Elections Election 2012
TRENDING NOW
No, It’s Not Harder to Buy Allergy Medicine than a Gun

News  

Friday, September 14, 2018

No, It’s Not Harder to Buy Allergy Medicine than a Gun

A twist on an inaccurate old anti-gun talking point is making the rounds on social media. On September 10, anti-gun public relations professional Wendy Zipes Hunter tweeted about a purported recent trip to drug store. Hunter claimed, “Couldn’t ...

Anti-gun Senator Accompanied by “Unprecedented” Security Detail While Traveling in California

News  

Friday, September 14, 2018

Anti-gun Senator Accompanied by “Unprecedented” Security Detail While Traveling in California

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) is no fan of the Second Amendment. As California attorney general, she sided with local officials who refused to issue concealed carry permits to qualified, law-abiding applicants unless they could demonstrate an extraordinary ...

Gun Control Activist Urges Canadian Audience to Get Involved in U.S. Politics

News  

Friday, September 14, 2018

Gun Control Activist Urges Canadian Audience to Get Involved in U.S. Politics

For someone who has previously falsely accused the NRA of funneling foreign money into domestic politics, it must be that David Hogg either forgot he was in Canada recently or failed to appreciate that it’s also illegal ...

Levi’s Teams with Billionaire Michael Bloomberg to Attack Gun Rights

News  

Friday, September 7, 2018

Levi’s Teams with Billionaire Michael Bloomberg to Attack Gun Rights

Levi Strauss & Co. established its brand in the mid-19th century by selling durable clothing to working-class Americans. As Levi’s signature jeans gained popularity amongst a wider set in the middle of the last century, ...

“Law is Dead in Washington state” – Outraged Reaction to Court Decision on I-1639

News  

Friday, September 7, 2018

“Law is Dead in Washington state” – Outraged Reaction to Court Decision on I-1639

The Washington State constitution, Art. 2, sec. 1, contains an explicit direction that each “petition shall include the full text of the measure so proposed.” A state law incorporating this requirement specifies that all petitions circulated for signatures must ...

VIVE LE FRANCE?

News  

Friday, September 14, 2018

VIVE LE FRANCE?

Those who follow international news are painfully aware that France has seen a disturbing amount of terrorist attacks carried out within its borders over the last several years. Most are familiar with the January 2015 ...

New Jersey:  Latest Gimmick by Anti-Gun Politicians Is Simply More of The Same

Friday, September 14, 2018

New Jersey: Latest Gimmick by Anti-Gun Politicians Is Simply More of The Same

Just when you thought Trenton gun banners had run out of bad ideas, these attention starved politicians simply start recycling stuff that’s already outlawed in New Jersey.

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

Gun Laws  

Thursday, January 1, 2015

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

CAUTION: Federal and state firearms laws are subject to frequent change. This summary is not to be considered as legal advice or a restatement of law.

Surprise: Problems with Widely Touted Anti-Gun Research

News  

Friday, September 7, 2018

Surprise: Problems with Widely Touted Anti-Gun Research

“I am not interested in giving any serious thought to John Lott or his claims.” Those are the words of University of Alabama associate professor Adam Lankford in response to Fox News after economist John Lott called Lankford’s ...

Anti-gun Senator Distorts the Law and the Facts in Unsuccessful Attack on Supreme Court Nominee

News  

Friday, September 7, 2018

Anti-gun Senator Distorts the Law and the Facts in Unsuccessful Attack on Supreme Court Nominee

This week the nation was subjected to an embarrassing and undignified spectacle of obstructionist partisan politics surrounding the confirmation hearings of Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh for the U.S. Supreme Court. The Democrat caucus, understanding that ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.