NRA Explore
APPEARS IN News

Standing Guard June 2007

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

STANDING GUARD

WAYNE LAPIERRE, NRA Executive Vice President

“The Right To Ban Arms”

hat March 14, 2007, New York Times headline trumpeted an editorial excoriating the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia for declaring Washington D.C.’s 31-year-old ban on handguns in the home as unconstitutional under the Second Amendment.

The Times ranted that the decision “would imperil needed gun controls in place … .” But if the ruling imperils anything it is the tyranny such laws impose.

In writing for the majority in the 58-page ruling in Parker v. District of Columbia, Senior Judge Laurence H. Silberman was unambiguous: “We conclude that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms.

“In determining whether the Second Amendment’s guarantee is an individual one, or some sort of collective right, the most important word is the one the drafters chose to describe the holders of the right--‘the people.’ That term is found in the First, Second, Fourth, Ninth and Tenth Amendments.

Guns in the homes of law-abiding Americans is the issue here. Nothing more. And nothing less.

“It has never been doubted that these provisions were designed to protect the interests of individuals against government intrusion, interference or usurpation.” (Emphasis added.)

Juxtapose that with the Times’ assertion about the government’s “Right to Ban Arms.” How about a government “right” to close down newspapers? A government “right” to deny the vote because of race? What about denying rights for those practicing religion? All of those actions were taken by oppressive government and were stopped when protections of the people were ratified by the U.S. Constitution and applied. But the enemies of freedom do not care about that.

In its brief filed in support of the D.C. gun/self-defense ban, the Brady Campaign’s lawyers cited a pre-American Revolution royal edict as an example of precedence for gun control: “In the mid-eighteenth century, for example, Maryland prohibited the ownership of guns by Catholics … .” (Emphasis added.)

Yet that was the very reason the American colonists fought and died to throw off the yoke of the English Crown.

Reacting to the Parker decision, the Brady Campaign screeched that the ruling was “depriving D.C. citizens of a strict handgun law enacted thirty years ago.”

The truth is that D.C. residents--good, honest, hard-working families and individ-uals--were deprived of their right to be safe in their homes.

The Times got one thing right: The law the court struck down barred “residents from keeping handguns in their homes.” (Emphasis added.)

This law was never about armed predators. It was about criminalizing any prudent preparations for protecting one’s family and home. D.C.’s law punished the innocent and encouraged armed assault, rape and murder. It created thousands of victims. Since the ban, D.C. has consistently led the nation in criminal violence.

The Court of Appeals also nullified D.C.’s self-defense prohibition that made keeping any long gun functional and in the proximity of ammunition a criminal act. Unfortunately, the court left the city’s registration law unscathed. In truth, registration as “crime control” is a fraud. It cannot be applied to criminals--only to the law-abiding.

Haynes v. U.S., the seminal January 1968 Supreme Court opinion on crime and firearm registration, ruled: “We hold that a proper claim of the constitutional privilege against self-incrimination provides a full defense to prosecutions either for failure to register a firearm … or for possession of an unregistered firearm … .”

So the District’s draconian registration law only applied to those citizens who could lawfully own guns prior to 1976. When the D.C. City Council enacted the ban, a Washington Star headline said it all: “gun law upheld, but no searches yet.” Matter of factly, the Star spoke about house-to-house searches and sweeps by police, using firearm registration lists as a start for confiscation.

D.C. is a shameful example of that insanity on our shores. It is even more insane in light of what is happening in the rest of the nation. The same day I read the “Right to ban guns” headline in the Times, another headline stood in bold counterpoint. It said, “New Orleans Residents Arming Themselves.”

Katrina. New Orleans. For American gun owners, those words conjure the nightmare of government agents disarming residents, then utterly failing to protect them and leaving good people to the mercy of predatory criminal violence.

Americans are not stupid. They will not willingly become the victims The New York Times would like them to be. Instead, in huge numbers, they are affirming the right of armed self-defense--a right inherent in their overwhelming support of the Second Amendment. This is a time when legislatures across the nation--by wide margins--are enacting “no-retreat” laws, “Castle Doctrine laws,” and 48 states now affirm Right-to-Carry.

Perhaps soon our hard-fought efforts to secure a fair judiciary--one that interprets the Bill of Rights as it was intended by the Founders--will bear the fruit of true liberty.

TRENDING NOW

Tuesday, April 26, 2016

Missouri: Permitless Carry Self-Defense Legislation Overwhelmingly Passes House, Headed to Senate

Today, the Missouri House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed House Bill 1468.

Tuesday, April 26, 2016

Oklahoma: Hunting with Suppressors Legislation Signed into Law

Yesterday, Oklahoma Governor Mary Fallin signed House Bill 2637 into law and it goes into effect immediately.

Tuesday, April 26, 2016

Connecticut: Anti-Gun Bills Expected for Floor Vote Tomorrow

One or both of the anti-gun bills, House Bill 5054 and House Bill 5623, may be called as early as tomorrow to go to the House floor for consideration by the full House of Representatives.  Both HB 5054 and ...

Wednesday, April 27, 2016

California: Anti-Gun Bills Still Alive After Policy Committee Deadline

After a busy week of hearings, Friday April 22nd marked the deadline for bills with a fiscal note to be passed out of their respective policy committees. Bills not meeting this deadline are considered defeated ...

News  

Tuesday, April 26, 2016

Merrick Garland MUST NOT be confirmed to the U.S. Supreme Court

The U.S. Senate needs to hear from you TODAY that Merrick Garland MUST NOT be confirmed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

News  

Wednesday, April 27, 2016

Political Report | Disarmament Cloaked as "Common Sense"

Gun control advocates have been at their civilian-disarmament campaign for so long that astute observers will notice the same tactics and approaches returning time and again to the political landscape. When the American public rejects ...

Wednesday, April 27, 2016

Missouri: Urgent - Stand Your Ground Amendment to be Considered by Senate

Today, Missouri State Senator Kurt Schaefer (R-Columbia) amended Senate Bill 663 with critical self-defense language, known as Stand Your Ground.

Monday, April 25, 2016

Rhode Island: Wave of Gun Legislation Rolls Into the Ocean State

Tomorrow, April 26, the Senate Judiciary Committee will meet to consider a full agenda including over a dozen gun bills.

Friday, April 22, 2016

Hypocrisy on Firearms Enforcement? Congressman Beyer, Heal Thyself!

On April 11, U.S. Rep. Donald S. Beyer, Jr. (D-VA) rolled out his so-called ATF Enforcement Act, H.R. 4905 in an opinion piece in the Washington Post.  Beyer claimed hypocrisy on the part of NRA and other pro-gun advocates who ...

News  

Friday, April 22, 2016

Professor: "How can I say I don't want to support students who are gun enthusiasts…"

More evidence that America’s institutions of higher education have given up any pretense of providing a bastion for the free exchange of ideas came this week in the form of a commentary published in the Chronicle ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -
NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.