NRA-ILA :: NRA Files Suit Against Winnetka, IL
         
 
SEARCH
EMAIL SIGNUP
In the News   |   Will gun-control case prompt a Constitutional reawakening?   |   An anti-pirate policy that works   |   Pennsylvania: Lawmakers hear arguments on self-defense bill   |   Florida: More exercising Right-to-Carry   |   Canada: Polls show gun registry viewed as ineffective   |   Senate committee approves Obama's anti-gun OSHA nominee   |   South Carolina will offer tax free holiday on guns   |   Washington: Richland men may sue city over gun ban in parks as violation of state law   |   Pennsylvania: Highspire Mayor supports illegal gun control measure   |   Now armed, Maersk Alabama repels pirate attack   |   Time to revisit firearms policies on military posts   |   Ex-customs chief urges ban on popular semi-autos   |   Armed pilots and dead terrorists   |   Florida: Adoptive parents fuming over gun question   |   Experts square off on right to bear arms   |   Burglars fear armed residents more than the police   |   Idaho may consider extending wolf hunt season   |   New Jersey: Report suggests changes to state gun rationing law   |   Iowa: Guns in parks debated at UNI   |   North Dakota: Increased interest in gun rights

Bookmark 

and Share     Printer Friendly Email to a friend Take Action


NRA Files Suit Against Winnetka, IL

Tuesday, September 23, 2008


Village Council Backed Away from Repealing Ban


Fairfax, VA—After months of waiting in good faith for the repeal of a gun ban that never happened, the National Rifle Association (NRA) has filed a lawsuit against Winnetka, IL in U.S. District Court.

“The Supreme Court ruled in Heller that the Second Amendment right is exercised individually and belongs to all Americans. NRA is tired of waiting for Winnetka Village to do the right thing. We’ve been told for months that the Village Council would study the issue and vote on a repeal of their gun ban, but no such action has taken place,” said Chris W. Cox, NRA’s chief lobbyist. “Winnetka has refused to act, so it’s time for NRA to act instead.”

NRA did not file suit against Winnetka at the same time as their lawsuits against Chicago, Oak Park, Evanston and Morton Grove, because they indicated their openness to studying and repealing the ban. The Village Attorney has confirmed the Village Council has planned no action on the ban in the near future. The four plaintiffs in the suit are NRA and three members.

“American citizens living in Washington, D.C., Illinois or any other state, have the right to defend themselves and their family at home, regardless of whether their home is in the housing projects or a high end suburb,” Cox concluded. “The Winnetka Village ban flat-out denies that right, and NRA will not rest until the Second Amendment is recognized and protected in Winnetka just as the Supreme Court ruled it shall be in Washington, D.C.”

 

-NRA-


 

Copyright 2009, National Rifle Association of America, Institute for Legislative Action.
This may be reproduced. It may not be reproduced for commercial purposes.
11250 Waples Mill Road, Fairfax, VA 22030    800-392-8683 
Contact Us | Privacy & Security Policy

For The Media
Did You Know
Before Congress and President Clinton approved the Brady bill in 1993, laws delaying handgun purchases were known to have no effect on crime. During 1992, the most recent year of data available when the Brady bill was passed, California, the state with the most restrictive waiting period law (15 days on all firearm sales, retail and private) had total violent crime and murder rates 58% and 44% higher, respectively, than the rates for the rest of the country. (FBI)
MORE>>