NRA-ILA :: Authors Of The 1994 Clinton Gun Ban Push To Expand It
         
 
SEARCH
EMAIL SIGNUP
In the News   |   North Carolina: Residents fumed over emergency firearm ban   |   Kopel: How the right to arms saved the non-violent civil rights protesters   |   Date draws near to allow firearms in national parks   |   Texas: Duel over gun safety in Capitol   |   Montana: Wildlife agency takes up lead ammo ban this week   |   Canada: Blatant invasion of privacy   |   Nebraska: Committee hears arguments on bill on using deadly force against intruders   |   Still waiting for those wild west shootouts   |   Maine: Democratic candidates differ on gun background checks   |   Georgia: Right-to-Carry in Churches   |   California: Oakland passes record-keeping requirement for ammunition sales   |   Maine: Proposal targets gun ban for parks   |   Delaware: Newark Housing Authority withdraws gun ban   |   University of Arizona students protest gun resolution   |   Arizona: Push is on to liberalize gun laws   |   California: NRA/CRPA submit letter opposing gun control ordinances being considered by the Oakland City Council   |   Maryland: Baltimore's incoming Mayor seeks more gun control   |   Oklahoma: More women are exercising Right-to-Carry   |   Utah: Self-defense bill moves to House floor   |   Connecticut: Permit applicants don't need letters of reference

Bookmark 

and Share     Email       Printer Friendly Take Action

 
Authors Of The 1994 Clinton Gun Ban Push To Expand It
 

On May 8, two bills to expand the 1994 Clinton Gun Ban, the so-called "assault weapon" law, were introduced in Congress. In the House of Representatives, Rep. Carolyn McCarthy introduced H.R. 2038, a bill to ban millions more guns than the Clinton ban does, by arbitrarily changing the federal definition of "assault weapon" so that it applies to more guns and basic types of guns than before. The bill also ban millions more ammunition magazines than the Clinton ban does, and it begins backdoor registration of gun owners. (Click here for the H.R. 2038 fact sheet.)

In the Senate, the 1994 law's authors, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Sen. (then-Rep.) Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), introduced S. 1034. The bill is less extreme than McCarthy's, which they hope will give it a greater chance of passage. The two senators' recently explained their strategy:

Feinstein also said she would like to push for stronger gun controls, but "it isn't in the cards right now." "We know that if we push it too far, we'll have no bill," Schumer added. (Los Angeles Times, May 9, 2003.)

When Sen. Feinstein says "right now," it has a special meaning. She is already on record supporting gun confiscation, having said, "If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them, Mr. and Mrs. America, turn them all in, I would have done it. I could not do that. The votes weren't there." --CBS 60 Minutes, Dec. 5, 1995

S. 1034 Does Not Merely "Reauthorize" or "Extend" the Clinton Gun Ban
  • It Permanently bans millions of guns and ammunition magazines, including magazines used in the most popular target shooting rifles and conventional handguns. Congress limited the Clinton Gun Ban to a 10-year trial period, and mandated that during that period a study be conducted of its effectiveness. The study found that the law has had little, if any, effect on crime, because "the banned weapons and magazines were never involved in more than a modest fraction of all gun murders." (Urban Institute, "Impact Evaluation of the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act of 1994," 3/13/97.) Obviously, the law should not have been imposed, and it deserves to terminate on schedule.
  • It expands the Clinton Gun Ban by banning the importation of magazines. Currently, all magazines made before the Clinton ban took effect are legal. Most guns that would be affected by a new ban on imported magzines are expensive, conventional handguns, like Brownings and Berettas.
  • It Places legitimate importers at increased risk of groundless prosecution for a 10-year felony offense. Under the 1994 law, when a person is charged with possessing a magazine manufactured after the law's effective date, the government has the burden of proving that the magazine was manufactured after that date. However, S. 1034 does not impose the same burden of proof upon the government if a person is charged with importing a magazine manufactured after that date. The omission is designed to intimidate legitimate importers into not importing magazines at all, for fear that, unbeknowst to them, even a single magazine they imported might have been manufactured after that date.
 
Posted: 1/11/2004 12:00:00 AM
 
 

Copyright 2010, National Rifle Association of America, Institute for Legislative Action.
This may be reproduced. It may not be reproduced for commercial purposes.
11250 Waples Mill Road, Fairfax, VA 22030    800-392-8683 
Contact Us | Privacy & Security Policy

Related Articles
Hunting With Modern Semi-Automatic Rifles--The AR Afield
Showing Their True Colors
The"Blame America" Beat Goes On
Mexico Drug Wars: Will Gun Owners be the Scapegoats?
"Assault Weapons" 2009
MORE>>
Related Fact Sheets
Semi-Automatic Firearms and the “Assault Weapon” Issue
Why State Legislatures Should Reject Semi-Automatic and Pump-Action...
McCarthy Bill Bans Millions More Guns Than The Infamous Clinton Gun...
Lautenberg, Schumer Join Brady Campaign In Lying About the FN Fi...
Top 10 Reasons The Clinton Gun Ban Was Allowed To Expire
MORE >>
Related News Stories
Washington: Pro-gun activists show up en masse
1/27/2010
Washington: Semi-auto ban likely to fail
1/25/2010
Washington: Enforce gun laws on books already before passing more
12/29/2009
Washington: State lawmakers to seek ban on sales of semi-automatic ...
12/17/2009
Ex-customs chief urges ban on popular semi-autos
11/18/2009
MORE>>