NRA-ILA :: TIME Misrepresents BATF Firearm Transaction Tracing Data
         
 
SEARCH
EMAIL SIGNUP
In the News   |   North Carolina: Residents fumed over emergency firearm ban   |   Kopel: How the right to arms saved the non-violent civil rights protesters   |   Date draws near to allow firearms in national parks   |   Texas: Duel over gun safety in Capitol   |   Montana: Wildlife agency takes up lead ammo ban this week   |   Canada: Blatant invasion of privacy   |   Nebraska: Committee hears arguments on bill on using deadly force against intruders   |   Still waiting for those wild west shootouts   |   Maine: Democratic candidates differ on gun background checks   |   Georgia: Right-to-Carry in Churches   |   California: Oakland passes record-keeping requirement for ammunition sales   |   Maine: Proposal targets gun ban for parks   |   Delaware: Newark Housing Authority withdraws gun ban   |   University of Arizona students protest gun resolution   |   Arizona: Push is on to liberalize gun laws   |   California: NRA/CRPA submit letter opposing gun control ordinances being considered by the Oakland City Council   |   Maryland: Baltimore's incoming Mayor seeks more gun control   |   Oklahoma: More women are exercising Right-to-Carry   |   Utah: Self-defense bill moves to House floor   |   Connecticut: Permit applicants don't need letters of reference

Bookmark 

and Share     Email       Printer Friendly Take Action

 
TIME Misrepresents BATF Firearm Transaction Tracing Data
 

7/23/02

TIME magazine long ago admitted that its position on "gun control" is that of an advocate. In 1982, it declared, "The point has now been reached where, in our judgment, the solution is not tighter controls but an outright ban. . . . A nationwide ban on private possession of handguns . . . would be a start--a movement in the direction of common sense and responsible social policy." In 1989, it said, "The time for opinions on the dangers of gun availability is long since gone, replaced by overwhelming evidence that it represents a growing threat to public safety." And over the years, TIME has periodically published articles intended to generate public support for restrictions on guns.

On July 12, 2002, TIME.com, the magazine`s website, ran "America`s Most Wanted Guns: A new ATF study reveals the country`s Top 10 crime guns," an article by Elaine Shannon of the magazine`s Washington Bureau. Shannon`s central claim: that BATF`s firearm transaction traces had identified "The top 10 guns used in crimes in the U.S. in 2000."

The claim was incorrect in two respects. First, the "10 guns" are not the types of guns that were most often used to commit crimes, they were the types of guns that for various reasons were most often traced. The distinction is important, because most guns that are traced have not been used to commit violent crimes, many have not been used to commit any crimes, and most guns that are used to commit crimes are never traced. Second, traces are not representative of anything nationally, let alone criminal gun use. BATF acknowledges that its tracing system is "not designed to provide a representative sample of the United States, or even of large urban jurisdictions." Similarly, the Congressional Research Service (CRS) says, "Firearms selected for tracing do not constitute a random sample and cannot be considered representative of the larger universe of all firearms used by criminals, or of any subset of that universe."

A trace is not a scientific process by which a gun is linked to a crime scene. A "trace" is a procedure in which BATF, in an effort to identify persons involved in repetitive illegal sales of guns, contacts a particular gun`s manufacturer or importer, asks to whom the gun was sold, and repeats the inquiry through the chain of commerce as far as it can. Tracing statistics should not be confused with those that state and local law enforcement agencies compile on the kinds of weapons that have been used to commit crimes.

According to the CRS, "data from the tracing system may not be appropriate for drawing inferences such as which makes or models of firearms are used for illicit purposes." This is because of the reasons noted above and because traces are often disproportionately conducted on guns in which there is a particular political interest. For example, police reports have always shown very little use of "assault weapons" in crime, but those guns were frequently traced during the late 1980s and early 1990s, when they were a hot "gun control" issue. For additional information on how BATF traces have been misrepresented to promote restrictions on guns, visit www.nraila.org/search.asp and type the word "traces."

 
Posted: 8/1/2002 12:00:00 AM
 
 

Copyright 2010, National Rifle Association of America, Institute for Legislative Action.
This may be reproduced. It may not be reproduced for commercial purposes.
11250 Waples Mill Road, Fairfax, VA 22030    800-392-8683 
Contact Us | Privacy & Security Policy

Related Articles
Political Report: NRA-ILA Wins Court Victories On Two Coasts
Surrendering Rights In San Francisco?
Defenseless In D.C.
"Smart Guns" by Dave Kopel
Firearm Traces: The Anti-Gunners' Big Lie
MORE>>
Related Fact Sheets
Handguns: Summary
Kennedy Introduces a Handgun Ban in Congress Again
The Case For Reforming The District of Columbia`s Gun Laws
H.R. 1384: The Firearms Commerce Modernization Act
Lautenberg, Schumer Join Brady Campaign In Lying About the FN Fi...
MORE >>
Related News Stories
Mayors rally support for Chicago gun ban
1/22/2010
Virginia: Delegate wants to repeal handgun rationing law
1/8/2010
Gun rationing bill revised by N.J. Assembly
1/5/2010
California: Microstamping triggers backlash from gun industry
12/30/2009
New Jersey: Senate approves exemptions to handgun rationing
12/14/2009
MORE>>