NRA-ILA :: Don’t Buy Claims About Tiahrt Gun Amendment
         
 
SEARCH
EMAIL SIGNUP
In the News   |   North Carolina: Residents fumed over emergency firearm ban   |   Kopel: How the right to arms saved the non-violent civil rights protesters   |   Date draws near to allow firearms in national parks   |   Texas: Duel over gun safety in Capitol   |   Montana: Wildlife agency takes up lead ammo ban this week   |   Canada: Blatant invasion of privacy   |   Nebraska: Committee hears arguments on bill on using deadly force against intruders   |   Still waiting for those wild west shootouts   |   Maine: Democratic candidates differ on gun background checks   |   Georgia: Right-to-Carry in Churches   |   California: Oakland passes record-keeping requirement for ammunition sales   |   Maine: Proposal targets gun ban for parks   |   Delaware: Newark Housing Authority withdraws gun ban   |   University of Arizona students protest gun resolution   |   Arizona: Push is on to liberalize gun laws   |   California: NRA/CRPA submit letter opposing gun control ordinances being considered by the Oakland City Council   |   Maryland: Baltimore's incoming Mayor seeks more gun control   |   Oklahoma: More women are exercising Right-to-Carry   |   Utah: Self-defense bill moves to House floor   |   Connecticut: Permit applicants don't need letters of reference

Bookmark 

and Share     Email       Printer Friendly Take Action

 
Reckless Lawsuits
Don’t Buy Claims About Tiahrt Gun Amendment
 

Don’t Buy Claims About Tiahrt Gun Amendment

by Chuck Canterbury, National President of the Fraternal Order of Police

Some of America’s mayors, led by Mayor Michael Bloomberg of New York City and Thomas M. Menino of Boston, would like you to believe that their Mayors Against Illegal Guns coalition is about fighting illegal firearms in their cities and across the country.

It’s not.

The principal goal of this coalition is the repeal of language that has repeatedly been passed into law for the past several years that prevents information on gun traces collected by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) from being given to mayors pursuing civil litigation suits against firearm dealers and manufacturers. The mayors would have you believe that law enforcement supports giving them the information on gun traces because many of their employees--namely police chiefs, who often serve at the pleasure of the mayor--have publicly backed their coalition.

But the officers in the field who are actually working illegal gun cases know that releasing sensitive information about pending cases can jeopardize the integrity of an investigation or even place the lives of undercover officers in danger. That is why the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) has always supported language protecting firearm trace data, now known as the Tiahrt Amendment. For the men and women in uniform who are fighting illegal guns, it is a matter of officer safety and good police work.

In media reports last year, law enforcement sources cited that as many as four cases were compromised and an additional 14 were put at risk by private investigators employed by New York City who acted on the basis of trace data.

ATF itself has repeatedly gone to court to fight the release of its data, because the release can have a negative effect on its efforts to investigate illegal gun trafficking and threaten the safety of officers and witnesses.

In media reports last year, law enforcement sources cited that as many as four cases were compromised and an additional 14 were put at risk by private investigators employed by New York City who acted on the basis of trace data. In this case, the investigators conducted “sting” operations in support of the city’s civil suit against several gun stores that had been identified through firearm trace data. As a result, several gun trafficking suspects under investigation by law enforcement changed their behavior to avoid scrutiny and criminal indictment. This is exactly the type of interference that caused the FOP to originally support language restricting the use of the data to law enforcement entities only--not cities engaged in lawsuits.

Bad actors trafficking in illegal guns should be arrested, prosecuted, convicted and sentenced. If these mayors really want to make a contribution to the investigation and apprehension of those who illegally traffic in--and criminally misuse--firearms, they should use their political clout to secure additional funding for ATF, instead of trying to develop a shadow enforcement program.

Firearm trace data is collected by ATF for public safety, not for civil litigation.

We urge members of Congress to continue to support the Tiahrt Amendment. Let’s send the bad guys to jail, not civil court.

-- published in the Wichita Eagle on April 24, 2007

 
Posted: 5/24/2007 11:13:06 AM
 
 

Copyright 2010, National Rifle Association of America, Institute for Legislative Action.
This may be reproduced. It may not be reproduced for commercial purposes.
11250 Waples Mill Road, Fairfax, VA 22030    800-392-8683 
Contact Us | Privacy & Security Policy

Related Articles
Political Report: NRA-ILA Wins Court Victories On Two Coasts
Surrendering Rights In San Francisco?
Defenseless In D.C.
"Smart Guns" by Dave Kopel
Firearm Traces: The Anti-Gunners' Big Lie
MORE >>
Related Fact Sheets
"Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act"
Taxpayer Funded Reckless Lawsuits Against The Firearms Industry
Courts Reject Lawsuits Against Gun Makers
MORE >>
Related News Stories
Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act under attack
8/31/2009
Lawsuit against gunmaker tossed
5/12/2009
Illinois Supreme Court Dismisses Lawsuit Against Gun Industry
3/19/2009
The failure of New York City's gun maker lawsuit
3/13/2009
Justices decline New York gun suit
3/10/2009
MORE>>