NRA-ILA :: NRA First To File Constitutional Challenge To Campaign Finance Law
         
 
SEARCH
EMAIL SIGNUP
In the News   |   North Carolina: Residents fumed over emergency firearm ban   |   Kopel: How the right to arms saved the non-violent civil rights protesters   |   Date draws near to allow firearms in national parks   |   Texas: Duel over gun safety in Capitol   |   Montana: Wildlife agency takes up lead ammo ban this week   |   Canada: Blatant invasion of privacy   |   Nebraska: Committee hears arguments on bill on using deadly force against intruders   |   Still waiting for those wild west shootouts   |   Maine: Democratic candidates differ on gun background checks   |   Georgia: Right-to-Carry in Churches   |   California: Oakland passes record-keeping requirement for ammunition sales   |   Maine: Proposal targets gun ban for parks   |   Delaware: Newark Housing Authority withdraws gun ban   |   University of Arizona students protest gun resolution   |   Arizona: Push is on to liberalize gun laws   |   California: NRA/CRPA submit letter opposing gun control ordinances being considered by the Oakland City Council   |   Maryland: Baltimore's incoming Mayor seeks more gun control   |   Oklahoma: More women are exercising Right-to-Carry   |   Utah: Self-defense bill moves to House floor   |   Connecticut: Permit applicants don't need letters of reference

Bookmark 

and Share     Email       Printer Friendly Take Action


NRA First To File Constitutional Challenge To Campaign Finance Law

Wednesday, March 27, 2002

JOINT STATEMENT BY WAYNE LAPIERRE , EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, THE NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and JAMES JAY BAKER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, NRA`S INSTITUTE FOR LEGISLATIVE ACTION

(Washington, D.C.) --"Early this morning, President Bush signed into law the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act ("BCRA"). When the federal courthouse opened for business today, NRA was there – we have filed suit to invalidate this unconstitutional infringement on the First Amendment rights of the NRA and our four million members nationwide.

We are proud to be the first plaintiff to formally ask the federal court to invalidate these new limits on the political speech of ordinary citizens because we believe that this law cannot be allowed to stand – not even for a moment.

Sen. Paul Wellstone said on the floor of the United States Senate during the campaign finance debate that it was his intention to silence the NRA. As a direct and intentional target of this law, NRA has no choice but to protect our right to be heard.

NRA has been mentioned by name – but the authors of this law have delivered a clear and straightforward message not only to NRA but to all American citizens. That message is this: ‘Keep your mouths shut.` ‘Stay out of our political debates.` ‘Be quiet.`

Our response is this: the First Amendment protects us from such directives from the government. The First Amendment does not allow Congress to make laws which deny us the right to speak out on issues, the right of our members to associate together on public policy issues and the right to petition our government for redress of grievances. That is what this lawsuit is about.

Through this law Congress has essentially granted speech licenses to giant corporate conglomerates such as Viacom, Disney Corporation and General Electric Company by allowing those corporations unlimited rights to spend money talking about issues and candidates, while silencing the voices of ordinary citizens and citizens groups such as NRA.

Why should corporations such as these media conglomerates, all of which own multiple non-news business enterprises and spend millions of dollars lobbying Congress—why should those corporations be allowed to spend whatever they wish, whenever they wish, saying whatever they wish regarding any issue or candidate – when a non-profit citizens organization such as ours is prohibited from even responding via the broadcast media?

The law imposes severe civil and criminal penalties on citizens who have the audacity to speak out on issues of concern – and we do not believe that the Constitution of the United States of America and the U.S. Supreme Court can possibly allow such a result."

Attorneys for NRA are Charles Cooper, Cooper & Kirk, P.L.L.C. (202) 220-9600 and Cleta Mitchell, Foley & Lardner, (202) 295-4081. Both are from Washington, D.C. The docket # for NRA v. FEC is 02-581.


 

Copyright 2010, National Rifle Association of America, Institute for Legislative Action.
This may be reproduced. It may not be reproduced for commercial purposes.
11250 Waples Mill Road, Fairfax, VA 22030    800-392-8683 
Contact Us | Privacy & Security Policy

For The Media
Did You Know
School violence is more than 23 times more likely to be unrelated to guns, according to a national survey of school principals. (Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics report "Violence and Discipline Problems in U.S. Public Schools: 1996-97")
MORE>>