NRA-ILA :: "Encoded Ammunition"/Bullet Serialization
         
 
SEARCH
EMAIL SIGNUP
In the News   |   Will gun-control case prompt a Constitutional reawakening?   |   An anti-pirate policy that works   |   Pennsylvania: Lawmakers hear arguments on self-defense bill   |   Florida: More exercising Right-to-Carry   |   Canada: Polls show gun registry viewed as ineffective   |   Senate committee approves Obama's anti-gun OSHA nominee   |   South Carolina will offer tax free holiday on guns   |   Washington: Richland men may sue city over gun ban in parks as violation of state law   |   Pennsylvania: Highspire Mayor supports illegal gun control measure   |   Now armed, Maersk Alabama repels pirate attack   |   Time to revisit firearms policies on military posts   |   Ex-customs chief urges ban on popular semi-autos   |   Armed pilots and dead terrorists   |   Florida: Adoptive parents fuming over gun question   |   Experts square off on right to bear arms   |   Burglars fear armed residents more than the police   |   Idaho may consider extending wolf hunt season   |   New Jersey: Report suggests changes to state gun rationing law   |   Iowa: Guns in parks debated at UNI   |   North Dakota: Increased interest in gun rights

Bookmark 

and Share     Printer Friendly Email to a friend Take Action

 
"Encoded Ammunition"/Bullet Serialization
 

"Encoded Ammunition" (Bullet and Cartridge Case Serialization) Means:

* Forfeiture of Currently-Owned Ammunition

* A Separate Registration for Every Box of New Ammunition

* Outrageously Expensive Ammunition Costs for Police & Private Citizens Alike

*A Waste of Taxpayer Money, Better Spent on Traditional Police Programs

In 2007, the sponsor of "encoded ammunition" legislation in Maryland urged lawmakers across the country to introduce the same kind of legislation in their states. The bill would require ammunition manufacturers to engrave a serial number on "the base of the bullet and the inside of the cartridge casing of each round" of ammunition for popular sporting caliber center-fire rifles, all center-fire pistols, all .22 rimfire rifles and pistols, and all 12 gauge shotguns.

Reasons to Strenuously Oppose This Legislation

People would be required to forfeit all personally-owned non-encoded ammunition. After a certain date, it would be illegal to possess non-encoded ammunition. Gun owners possess hundreds of millions of rounds of ammunition for target shooting, hunting and personal protection. Consider that American manufacturers produce 8 billion rounds each year.

Reloading (re-using cartridge cases multiple times) would be abolished. There would be no way to correspond serial numbers on cartridge cases, and different sets and quantities of bullets.

People would be required to separately register every box of "encoded ammunition." This information would be supplied to the police. Most states do not even require registration of guns. Each box of ammunition would have a unique serial number, thus a separate registration.

Private citizens would have to maintain records, if they sold ammunition to anyone, including family members or friends.

The cost of ammunition would soar, for police and private citizens alike. The Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturing Institute estimates it would take three weeks to produce ammunition currently produced in a single day. For reason of cost, manufacturers would produce only ultra-expensive encoded ammunition, which police would have to buy, just like everyone else.

A tax of five cents a round would be imposed on private citizens, not only upon initial sale, but every time the ammunition changes hands thereafter.

Shotgun ammunition cannot be engraved. Shotgun pellets are too small to be individually engraved. Shotgun cartridge cases are made of plastic, which would be difficult to engrave.

Criminals could beat the system. A large percentage of criminals' ammunition (and guns) is stolen. Criminals could also collect ammunition cases from shooting ranges, and reload them with molten lead bullets made without serial numbers.

Congress eliminated a similar requirement in the 1980s, because there was no law enforcement benefit. Federal law had required purchasers of handgun ammunition to sign a ledger, but Congress repealed that requirement in 1983 (.22 rimfire) and 1986 (center-fire handguns), because it burdened purchasers, vendors and police, with no law enforcement benefit.


NRANews.com Interview with Russ Ford of Ammunition Coding Systems

 
Posted: 1/25/2008 12:00:00 AM
 
 

Copyright 2009, National Rifle Association of America, Institute for Legislative Action.
This may be reproduced. It may not be reproduced for commercial purposes.
11250 Waples Mill Road, Fairfax, VA 22030    800-392-8683 
Contact Us | Privacy & Security Policy

Related Articles
No Bullets, No Shooting!
Sliding Down The Slippery Slope
Review AB1717 report Technical Evaluation: Feasibility of a Ballist...
Technical Evaluation: Feasibility of Ballistics Imaging Database fo...
MORE>>
Related Fact Sheets
Ammunition Summary
"Encoded Ammunition"/Bullet Serialization
Lockyer, Dunn and Perata Misrepresent Their Bullet Registration Scheme
Lautenberg, Schumer Join Brady Campaign In Lying About the FN Fi...
CA Attorney General Lockyer Reports Ballistic "Fingerprinting" Flawed
MORE >>
Related News Stories
Ammunition sales remain strong
11/3/2009
California: NRA firing back at ammunition bill
10/28/2009
California: Businesses say new ammo sales law could hurt bottom line
10/20/2009
California: Ventura County divided over ammunition law
10/19/2009
California: Gun stores preparing for ammo restrictions
10/19/2009
MORE>>